HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › How liberal/progressives "argue/debate"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How liberal/progressives "argue/debate"

post #1 of 14
Thread Starter 


Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC View Post
I want the following people banned:

2shea
Techunter
Baggi
Vals
Bigcat


post #2 of 14
LOL thats funny. So true.

When did USMC post that crap?
post #3 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigcat View Post
LOL thats funny. So true.

When did USMC post that crap?
Go up to the quote and click on the small blue square after his name at the beginning of the quote. It will take you to the original post.
post #4 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlandsponger View Post


Originally Posted by USMC
I want the following people banned:

2shea
Techunter
Baggi
Vals
Bigcat





A lot can be said for the saying "Forget History and we
are Condemned to Repeat it". That racist pig is a good
example. After thousands of years of one oppressive,
fascist dictatorship after another, these clowns don't
see the Irony in what they think and want.





.



.
post #5 of 14
post #6 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booyah View Post
Haha thats great
post #7 of 14
One thing I've found in common among most (not all) liberal arguments, is that they change the subject to something other than the topic at hand; ignore the facts, or are uneducated about the facts and choose to try to intelligently argue their point without the relevant facts; and finally, blame a previous administration, in this case Bush or even sometimes Reagan.

Take a look at some of the threads started, and how they progress from the topic at hand and move on toward bringing up previous administrations' mistakes, sometimes not even relevant to the topic. It can be quite amusing once you start to pay attention...
post #8 of 14
Thread Starter 
‘Marginal’: Travel Channel’s Anthony Bourdain Calls Tea Partiers ‘Very Angry White People’

Quote:
"They're insuring that no reasonably electable Republican will be President. They're taking over the party in a way that makes them look more or less crazy."
post #9 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by duderonomy View Post
One thing I've found in common among most (not all) liberal arguments, is that they change the subject to something other than the topic at hand; ignore the facts, or are uneducated about the facts and choose to try to intelligently argue their point without the relevant facts; and finally, blame a previous administration, in this case Bush or even sometimes Reagan.

Take a look at some of the threads started, and how they progress from the topic at hand and move on toward bringing up previous administrations' mistakes, sometimes not even relevant to the topic. It can be quite amusing once you start to pay attention...
Yea I've seen that a lot. You ask some liberals how will we pay for healthcare they ignore your question and start asking if you want people dying on the street because they couldn't get healthcare.
post #10 of 14
im sad... i didnt make that list =(
post #11 of 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by m00ler View Post
im sad... i didnt make that list =(
You are not cool enough.
post #12 of 14
post #13 of 14
Thread Starter 
post #14 of 14
Thread Starter 
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Politics
HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › How liberal/progressives "argue/debate"