angrysky's sub penny storm thought share - Page 27

afpw .036



http://www.azom.com/news.asp?newsID=21747


Early production stage hydrogen generation company AlumiFuel Power, Inc. (“API”), the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based wholly owned operating subsidiary of AlumiFuel Power Corporation (OTCBB: AFPW), (the “Company”), announced today that its technology was featured in two recent news media articles.


In the online technical reference resource, Knovel Engineering Cases, an article by API’s President & CEO, Mr. David Cade, was featured in the March 12, 2010 issue. Following are excerpts from the article:


Portable Balloon Inflation System


“Chemical engineers know better than anyone the difficulties in turning a promising lab curiosity into an actual product. Consider, for example, aluminum-water reactions as a means for generating hydrogen gas. For decades, researchers have been trying to tap the commercial potential of these reactions, which have the potential to produce hydrogen without the high costs and energy inefficiency of steam reforming and electrolysis techniques and systems. Over the years, there have been scores of patents and technical papers documenting efforts to harness the hydrogen-generating power of aluminum-water reactions.

By and large, these efforts have remained in the lab because of the thorny chemistry and engineering development challenges associated with the commercialization and “productization” of the technology. Until now. AlumiFuel Power, Inc., this month introduced a new aluminum-water reactor system called the Portable Balloon Inflation System, or PBIS-1000. Unlike other hydrogen generation technologies, this portable hydrogen generator requires no external energy whatsoever….and can generate 1,000 liters of hydrogen in about 20 minutes; this is enough lift gas to launch a 5-foot-diameter weather balloon.

AlumiFuel’s engineers also made the hydrogen generation system modular, scalable, and flexible, in keeping with the diverse group of applications that the technology targets. AlumiFuel engineers also are working on other form factors, including some that do not make use of the current reactor hardware. UUV power plants using turbines, thermoelectric converters, and/or fuel cells are one example…..a common thread runs through all these applications: Tailor the reaction chemistry to the job at hand and find clever ways to package that chemistry for the user.”

In the other feature, API’s Director of Engineering, Mr. Sean McIntosh, was cited in an article in the May 2010 Fuel Cell Bulletin: “Now, voyager? The increasing marine use of fuel cells”, by Vicki P. McConnell. An excerpt from the article follows: “Early-stage production company, AlumiFuel Power, Inc. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) is designing a hydrogen generator for UUVs that reacts aluminum, water and proprietary additives to create H2. The company is also developing a steam generator, and hopes to integrate both technologies ‘to increase energy density even more,’ says engineering director Sean McIntosh. Such a hybrid system has the potential to beat the energy density values of lithium batteries fivefold. ‘Each generator would be activated at different times, depending on mission requirements and profile,’ McIntosh explains.”

This maritime applications initiative is directly related to the recent selection of API’s hydrogen generation technology for award of a U.S. Navy R&D contract as a novel new hydrogen source for powering future Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs).

sngx .26

amww .03



http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...s10q033110.htm

Dear Neighbor,

Earlier this year, the conservative-controlled U.S. Supreme Court threw elections across the United States into chaos by striking down longstanding restrictions on corporate spending in support of political candidates. The Citizens United decision's effect on future elections is yet to be fully understood, but it could be a terrible turn for the worse for our democracy.


In Colorado, though, our legislature passed a critical piece of legislation that will help citizens get the information they need to make an informed decision, even after Citizens United. Tuesday, Governor Bill Ritter signed Senate Bill 203 into law, which will require that corporations and unions disclose the money they spend supporting political candidates in our state. In addition, Senate Bill 203 bars spending on races in Colorado by foreign corporations. It doesn't close the floodgates potentially opened by the Citizens United decision, but it will allow concerned citizens and journalists to find out who is backing these candidates.

Republicans fought this bill tooth and nail right up until the end of the legislative session. Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry led the opposition to Senate Bill 203: unsurprising after comments made by his employer Senate candidate Jane Norton. Norton has praised the Citizens United decision, and expressed hope that the Supreme Court would strike down other limits on contributions-with or without disclosure. (Colorado Statesman, 1/29/2010) To have killed Senate Bill 203, as Norton's campaign manager Sen. Penry tried to do, and be left to guess about who is funding an avalanche of new political ads anticipated this fall, would be a totally unacceptable situation.

temn .009

ctbg .035

http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?...ion=getcompany

Through its majority-owned subsidiary Coil Tubing Technology Holdings, Inc. ("Coil Tubing Holdings"), in or around July 2009, Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” and “us”) opened a district sales office and in September 2009 added a tool repair facility in Haynesville, Louisiana. The Company believes that the facility is centrally located to service the “hot” natural gas drilling and work over activities in the Haynesville Shale plays of East Texas, North West Louisiana and Southern Arkansas. The facility is under a (3) year lease, which lease fees were pre-paid by the Company, which allows the Company to focus on those markets and the Company hopes to become an established Coil Tubing rental tool force in the region.


In January 2010, through Coil Tubing Holdings, its majority-owned subsidiary, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement with Revenue Participation & Purchase Options with a customer ("Sales Agreement"). Under the terms of the Sales Agreement, the customer may purchase certain tools at a discounted price so the customer may rent out the tools in certain foreign markets. Under certain conditions, the Company may provide additional tools to the customer at no cost but participate in the revenue generated by the rental of such tools. Further, at the end of the eighteen (18) month term of the Sales Agreement, the Company has the option to repurchase any tools sold to the customer.


In March and May of 2010, Jerry Swinford, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer was granted (2) patents for a Coil Tubing technology called the “Jet Motor”, represented by U.S. patent # 7,686,102 and Singapore patent # 146369, which the Company is provided the use of pursuant to an Employment Agreement. Mr. Swinford also has U.S. patents pending on a Jet Hammer, Rotating Tool and Coil Tubing Jars. The Company has built a series of 2 7/8” Coil Tubing (“CT”) Drilling Jars for use in domestic CT drilling and workover markets. The tools are in operation throughout the eastern and central United States.

A significant shareholder of the Company has contributed an aggregate of $212,304 in funding to the Company during the past four (4) months in connection with the sale of Convertible Notes, which Convertible Notes have a conversion rate of $0.003 per share (subject to anti-dilutive rights); an interest rate of 12% per annum; and are due on the second anniversary of their issuance date. The Convertible Notes are also guaranteed by our majority-owned subsidiary, Coil Tubing Holdings. The Company was also responsible for payment of attorneys fees incurred in such transactions and such amounts are included in the principal amount due.


On May 21, 2010, the Company obtained an Order (the “Order”) pursuant to its Motion for Fairness Hearing to Issue Securities Pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Motion”) in connection with its lawsuit filed on July 30, 2008, in which the Company, Coil Tubing Holdings and our Chief Executive Officer and sole Director, Jerry Swinford ("Plaintiffs"), filed suit against Grifco International, Inc. (“Grifco”), Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"), Depository Trust Corporation ("DTC") and the president of Grifco, James Dial (the "Defendants"). The case is pending as Cause No. 08-07-07397-CV in the Montgomery County, Texas, District Court, 9th Judicial District (the “Court”). The suit stems from Grifco's distribution of its 75,000,000 shares of our common stock in August 2007 ("Grifco Distribution").


The Motion requested that the Court hold a fairness hearing and issue an order approving the issuance of 228,136,867 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) without restrictive legend pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), which hearing was held on May 21, 2009.


The Shares represent shares of common stock sufficient to (a) satisfy the claims of DTCC/DTC participants who did not receive a sufficient number of shares of the Company in connection with the Grifco Distribution; (b) satisfy the claims of Grifco shareholders holding their shares in record form on the record date of the Grifco Distribution; (c) satisfy the claims of the Company’s shareholders holding their shares with DTCC/DTC participants on the record date of the Grifco Distribution; (d) satisfy the claims of the Company’s shareholders holding their shares in record form on the record date of the Grifco Distribution; and (e) satisfy the claims of certain shareholders of the Company who purchased shares of the Company’s common stock from the Company subsequent to the Grifco Distribution.


The Order approved the issuance of the Shares and provided that such Shares shall be exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Moving forward, we anticipate filing a no action letter with the Texas Securities Commission requesting the Texas Securities Commission to grant us no action relief in connection with the issuance of the Shares.

-2-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC.

/s/ Jerry Swinford
Jerry Swinford,
President

May 27, 2010

Will the dividends be regular?

cmsi .60


http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?...ion=getcompany

LOS ANGELES, May 27, 2010 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) -- Cannabis Medical Solutions Inc. (http://www.cannabismedsolutions.com/) /quotes/comstock/11k!cmsi (CMSI 0.60, -0.02, -3.23%) , a leading company specializing in both brick-and-mortar and online merchant payment solutions and financial security products for medical marijuana dispensaries and high-risk merchant accounts, today announced that the final date for shareholders of record to receive the benefit of the previously announced stock dividend is June 1, 2010. The ex-dividend date is June 2nd, 2010 with the due bill (distribution) for the dividend shares to shareholders as of the close of trading on June 1st being June 4, 2010.

The Company also announced that is has added six (6) new medical marijuana dispensaries as merchant processing clients in Colorado over the last week, with several more awaiting banking approval. The new client dispensaries will increase gross processing volume to CMSI to at least $2,000,000 annually. Further, the company has named B. Michael Friedman, founder of CMSI as interim CEO, as Mr. Kyle Gotshalk, currently CEO, has notified the Company of the necessity to take a leave of absence for personal reasons.

"As the principal founder and major shareholder of the Company, I have been involved in the day to day business decisions and responsible for banking partners and clients since inception. As we seek additional qualified, respected and 'hands on' management to join our board of directors during this tremendous stage of growth to our company, I am happy to take on the title in order to direct the day to day operations as we continue to build this company on behalf of our shareholders," stated B. Michael Friedman.

About Cannabis Medical Solutions Inc.

Cannabis Medical Solutions Inc. /quotes/comstock/11k!cmsi (CMSI 0.60, -0.02, -3.23%) (http://www.cannabismedsolutions.com/) has quickly become the most recognized brand and partner in both online and wireless niche merchant payment solutions. The Company offers a full spectrum of secure and reliable transaction processing solutions using traditional, Internet Point-of-Sale (POS), e-commerce and mobile (wireless) terminals in conjunction with Industry Alliance Partners. The Company has recently focused on providing payment solutions to the licensed medical marijuana dispensaries throughout 14 states. In an effort to keep these businesses within the guidelines of CA Proposition 215 and SB 420, Cannabis Medical Solutions offers reliable merchant payment solutions and closed loop pre-paid stored value and loyalty cards as a unique cash alternative to these regulated dispensaries for both operators and members of collectives. CMSI will seek to capitalize on this presently untapped and much needed solution, and presently provides services to multiple locations throughout California, New Mexico, Colorado and Montana.

Thanks,
Don't forget CBIS

Don't look for any mollycoddling of the earth here. Molycorp mines and produces lanthanide and molybdenum compounds, concentrates, and oxides using open-pit mining techniques. Lanthanides (which include cerium, lanthanum, and yttrium) are used in everything from cell phones and computers to X-Ray film and television glass. Molycorp filed to go public in April 2010, selling some $350 million in an initial public offering (IPO). The company plans to use funds from the IPO to modernize and expand its Mountain Pass, California, facility and for other corporate purposes. Molycorp will list its stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol MCP.


MCP ?

Going concern etc

fgovf .0841



Freegold Ventures Limited (Freegold), through its subsidiaries, carries on the business of acquiring and exploring precious metal properties in the United States and Canada. The Company carries out its operations in Alaska and Idaho through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Free Gold Recovery, USA (Freegold US) and Freegold Ventures Limited, USA (Freegold USA). The Company's material mineral properties are the Golden Summit Property, Alaska, and the Almaden Property, Idaho. Non-material exploration properties include the Rob, Vinasale and Union Bay properties in Alaska and the PGM A Property in Ontario.

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-ed...ny&CIK=1064052

cvvuf .115



CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. (CanAlaska) is an exploration-stage company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally in Canada. The Company’s principal focus is exploring for uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin area of Saskatchewan. As of April 30, 2009, CanAlaska controlled an exploration property portfolio in the Athabasca Basin totaling over 4,000 square miles. The Company also has a 72% interest in the Rise and Shine project and a 100% interest in the Reefton Project in New Zealand. During fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 (fiscal 2009), the Company disposed of its Granite Dome and Greymouth permits. In July 2009, the Company commenced the drill program at the Fond Du Lac Project. In July 2009, the Company executed an option agreement with Bayswater Uranium Corporation (Bayswater) to commence exploration of the Collins Bay Extension uranium project (CBX).

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-ed...ny&CIK=1023109

no pps/ chart?

The Company was formed in order to seek business opportunities in the area of expertise of the Company's principal stockholder, Mr. Roger Gordon, being biological and/or medical products for animal use. The Company principally operated in the field of generic animal health and nutrition products, specifically medicated feed additives (MFAs). MFAs are used preventively and therapeutically in animal feed to prevent disease and foster growth in livestock. In North America, 90% of all feed to animals contain MFAs, but has been on the decrease in the last five years. Our intended customers operate in the poultry, swine and cattle markets. The Company has historically focused its efforts on generic MFAs, as they have come off patent, therefore making them more economical to register with requisite regulators in the United States and Canada, with a view to bringing the products to market.

The Company ceased to market an under licensed related-party owned MFA, Oxytetracycline, and is continuing its discussions with third parties in connection with a possible merger agreement or share exchange pursuant to which control of the Company may be sold to such third parties. As market dynamics have undergone significant systemic changes over the past four years with the emergence of avian flu and the attendant fall in poultry consumption worldwide, management realized the identification process for new MFAs cannot be done with the limited resources of the Company. Furthermore, with the prices of feed, particularly maize, at record high prices, out intended customers have been hesitant to add to their expenses.

The Company's activities to date have been primarily organizational in nature and as a result the Company must be considered to be in its developmental stage. The Company relies solely on the efforts of its management and director and has no employees, owns few business assets, technology or real estate and since inception has been primarily involved in developing and refining its business plan, preliminarily identifying generic MFAs for registration, raising initial capital, and looking for other potential shareholder maximizing corporate actions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Management previously determined to refocus, assess and identify alternative business strategies due to prolonged high prices of maize and other inputs and other general systemic economic conditions affecting the business of the Company.

Recent Developments

The Company has booked no sales for this period and had received $66,000 donated capital from an outside third party during the period. As a result of the prolonged high prices of inputs and other general conditions affecting the business of the Company, management determined, earlier in its fiscal year, to refocus, assess and identify alternative business strategies. In July 2008, the Company was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “PPMA”. The Company is continuing its discussions with third parties in connection with a possible merger or share exchange pursuant to which control of the Company may be sold to such third parties.

Results of Operations

Results of Operations for the Periods ended March 31, 2010

The Company did not earn any revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We incurred general and administrative expenses in the amount of $18,585 and interest on long-term loans of $1,275 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $19,860 as compared to net loss of $7,136 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. As at March 31, 2010 we had cash of $26,556. The Company’s losses stem from the payment of professional fees.

During the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred general and administrative expenses in the amount of $30,101 and interest on long-term loans of $2,075. Our net loss for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $32,176 compared to net loss of $9,279 for the six months ended March 31, 2010.

The Company ceased its sales and marketing of the Company’s Oxytetracyline as well as the process of the Company pursuing opportunities in the generic MFAs areas. As stated in the prior quarter, the Company will not be importing further Oxytetracyline from the People’s Republic of China which is idleling production until the overall economic situation improves; and our factory suppliers have remained dormant and have not provided an ETA as to when production would resume. Due to acute fluctuations in the price of key ingredients; corn and soybeans; the ability for producers to manage price pressure is severely challenged. Corn prices see-sawed and surged 3 to-5 fold in the last 24 months to $750 USD per bushel mid 2008. Since its high, the price has continued its volatility and as an example from Jan 1st to March 31th 2010 prices swung 28% in 30 days from $450 USD per bushel to $350 USD per bushel. Farmers and buyers are taking a wait and see approach and farmers in particular are not selling their crops and trying to time the market. Management and analysts believe the competition for corn, once viewed as a commodity and now viewed as a matter of national security for countries, is here to stay. Though prices have dropped from historic highs, the price is still double that of three years ago in January 2006, and have trended upwards in the first half of 2010 The use of corn for the production of ethanol and the agricultural polices of leading petroleum usage countries continue to exert price and demand pressures on the market. Also confounding the problem is worldwide health concerns and reaction to animal borne disease transmission to humans.

aau .99



Almaden Minerals Limited is engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration and when warranted, development of mineral properties. The Company has property interests in Canada, United States and Mexico. The Company has two principal property interests: the Elk gold, silver property which includes the Siwash Gold deposit in Canada (100% interest), and the Caballo Blanco gold, silver, copper prospect in Mexico (100% interest subject to a sliding scale net smelter return royalty (NSR) and a 70% option agreement earn in right by Canadian Gold Hunter Corp). At December 31, 2008, the Company owned a 50% share interest in ATW Resources Limited (ATW) and a 33.2% share interest in Tarsis Capital Corp.

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-ed...ny&CIK=1015647

pfgy .19



Perfectenergy International Limited (Perfectenergy Nevada) conducts operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Perfectenergy International Limited (Perfectenergy BVI), and Perfectenergy BVI’s three wholly owned subsidiaries Perfectenergy (Shanghai) Limited, Perfectenergy GmbH and Perfectenergy Solar-Tech (Shanghai) Ltd., (Perfectenergy Solar-Tech). Perfectenergy BVI, through Perfectenergy Shanghai and Perfectenergy Solar-Tech, is principally engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, and sale of solar cells, solar modules, and photovoltaic systems. The Company’s operations consist of the research, development, manufacturing, and sale of solar cells, solar modules, and photovoltaic (PV) systems. Its manufacturing and research facility is located in Shanghai, China. The Company produces different kinds of cells, such as six inch cells and eight inch cells, mono-crystalline cells and multi-crystalline cells, and different types and sizes of solar modules.
Officers and directors
Wennan Li Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer
Age: 43

Xiaolin Zhuang Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Age: 38

Diping Zhou Vice President - Operations
Age: 42

Adam Mikel Roseman Director
Age: 31

Min Fan Director
Age: 45

Yunxia Yang Director
Age: 52

Yajun Wu

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 5:02 PM» lDuring the past year, exchange-traded fund (ETF) investors have welcomed a plethora of new funds to the marketplace. These new funds cover everything from municipal bonds to emerging market financials. But one of the most intriguing of this latest batch is a fund that covers a hitherto unexplored niche.

What's so exciting about this new fund is that it invests in companies that develop and implement one of the most important technologies to come about in a long time. It holds the key to securing an independent, "green" energy future for the United States right in the palm of its hand

Uncle Sam has recognized this technology's potential and, through generous grants and matching investments from utilities, has unleashed an $8 billion tidal wave that is washing over the sector.

I'm talking about "smart grid" technology. And if you haven't heard about this game-changing technology yet, you will.

But first, some background.

The electricity grid refers to the transmission systems that deliver electricity from power plants to regional substations, and the distribution equipment that routes the power from substations to homes and businesses. This outdated infrastructure has been woefully underfunded during the past half-century -- paltry investments for maintenance and upgrades haven't kept pace with steadily rising generating capacity.

In short, we've spent plenty to produce more power to meet the nation's growing needs, but very little to actually get it from point 'A' to point 'B'. As a result, the grid has become overburdened and in desperate need of a major overhaul. Estimates made by the American Society of Civil Engineers put the price tag well into the trillions.

For his part, President Obama has made it clear that transitioning to a smarter, 21st century grid is a top priority. Last October, the administration pledged $3.4 billion in stimulus grants to help speed up that modernization. In addition, long overdue expenditures made by the nation's 3,000 utilities will bring that total closer to $8 billion.

The goal isn't simply to alleviate congestion and reduce the threat of blackouts and other power disruptions. A smarter grid will be well-insulated from potential cyber attacks. It will also be optimized to make sure power is delivered as efficiently as possible. In part, that means equipping the system with automated two-way communication and installing smart home appliances that can lower energy use during times of peak demand.

The U.S. Department of Energy summarizes these enhancements as making the power grid more reliable, efficient and secure. Getting there won't be easy. Yesterday's infrastructure wasn't designed to carry power from remote wind farms in South Dakota to homes in Chicago. But ultimately we'll have a responsive, adaptable system that can adjust the flow of electricity to reduce power consumption and lower utility bills.

Obviously, this spells tremendous opportunity for the dozens of companies involved in this nascent field. For many, $8 million would be a huge influx of cash, let alone $8 billion -- and that's just a down-payment for the $1.5 trillion that will be needed during the next decade.


Companies that make intelligent power distribution equipment and other electrical hardware and devices will be obvious beneficiaries. But there will also be a need for software, energy storage, monitoring equipment and other related products.

Take digital smart meters, for example, which will be installed in more than 40 million homes within the next few years. That rush will lead to plenty of orders for manufacturers like Itron (Nasdaq: ITRI), which my colleague Andy Obermueller reports just landed a major deal with CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP).

At $200 per meter, this contract alone could add $44 million to the firm's bottom line, triple what it earned last quarter. Add it all up, and it's easy to understand why General Electric (NYSE: GE) believes this one market could generate $12 billion in annual sales within the next five years.

Virtually every major player with an interest in this high-stakes game can be found in the new fund's portfolio I mentioned earlier. It's the FT Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid (Nasdaq: GRID) ETF. Some of the holdings are conglomerates like GE and Siemens (NYSE: SI) with other lines of business, but I like the fact that 80% of the fund's assets have been reserved for pure-play specialists like iTron.

Action to Take --> GRID is uniquely positioned to cash in on the wave of funding that will soon inundate the relatively small smart-grid sector. But there is enough diversity among the fund's holdings to ensure that shareholders also have exposure to other sub-sectors of the green energy movement.

Like any relatively new fund, it has been a bit volatile, so risk-averse investors need to be cautious. But I think many of its holdings have powerful catalysts in their favor that could deliver triple-digit gains during the next few years. I will be monitoring the fund as a potential addition to the "Sector Trading" Portfolio for my ETF Authority newsletter. I suggest you do the same.


Nathan Slaughter

http://streetauthority.com/node/456135

I have been telling friends about this since last year and HP was the only link I could find too- haha

from penny sleuth

the memristor, a new type of electronic component that promises to completely change the face of electronics in just a few short years…

In 2007, Hewlett-Packard’s labs demonstrated the first memristor recognized as such. A portmanteau of “memory, and “resistor,” memristance was the theoretical fourth circuit variable, first described in 1971. While HP stock will probably not yield the sort of profits we’re looking for here, it will help generate them indirectly.

Because of its unique properties, Memristance will enable far more powerful circuitry. Unlike transistor-based circuits that form the core of modern electronics, memristive circuits retain their state after losing power. Theoretically, you could power on a memristor-based computer and have all the data in memory that it had when you powered off. Memristor memory could replace hard drives and transistor-based RAM.

Memristors, however, can do more than act as memory. They can replace existing processing components. This means that much more functionality can be implemented in a single component. Instead of busing data back and forth between separate memory and processing locations on a circuit board, memristors do it all. Data, then, are available for processing with shorter wait times. Memristors reduce total hardware size, cost and energy consumption. Yet memristors can multitask in other ways, opening up a whole range of exciting possibilities.

Existing circuit elements only have two states: something or nothing, one or zero. Binary arithmetic is, therefore, used to build up the mathematical functionality needed to implement the logic that gives a computer “intelligence.” Unlike binary elements, memristors can exist in more than two states. This allows the use of higher base number systems. A single memristor could, therefore, perform the work of many binary transistors. This would permit faster, more powerful processors and higher-density memory. An additional reduction in power consumption is another outcome, of course, since fewer elements would be needed.

The ability to be either logic or memory, along with the ability to assume multiple states, makes memristors more like neurons in the human brain. This similarity isn’t lost on researchers. The multistate capability, taken to its logical conclusion, means that a memristor could exist in virtually infinite states. Then, memristors could be used as analog, instead of digital elements. Such devices would be able to learn on their own, computer theorists say. In fact, simple memristive circuits have already been used to model the adaptive ability of amoebas.

Efforts are under way to fully map the 100,000 neurons in a fly’s brain, as reported in April’s issue of Nature Biotechnology. Once completed, the fly brain’s “circuitry” could possibly be reverse engineered with memristive circuitry. This would help us to better understand animal intelligence, and hence be able to develop true artificial intelligence. If sufficiently advanced, such computing devices would be able to easily recognize and differentiate between human faces and understand natural human language.

The memristor revolution is coming. HP expects its first commercially available memristive circuits to be available in three years.

HP remains the only direct play for memristive technology for now, but I’m on the lookout for a small upstart in this field that could still deliver substantial gains – I’ll let you know when it comes to light…

Until then, I’ve already alerted my Breakthough Technology Alert readers to a couple of tiny tech plays that could be forging the next steps in computing. To learn more, you should read my latest research report.

Sincerely,
Patrick Cox

scam?

gboe .0002



Amendment to the Agreement for the Stock Purchase Acquisition of H&M Precision Products, Inc.


On May 27, 2010, GeoBio Energy, Inc. (“GeoBio”), entered into an amendment to its Stock Purchase Agreement with H&M Precision Products, Inc. (“H&M”), dated on or around April 16, 2010 (the “H&M Stock Purchase Agreement”), for the purchase of one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of H&M (the “Amendment”).



On March 30, 2010, GeoBio Energy, Inc. (“GeoBio”), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Collins Stock Purchase Agreement”) to purchase one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Collins Construction, Inc. (“Collins”), in exchange for:


(i) Eight million dollars in cash ($8,000,000.00)(the “Collins Cash Consideration”), Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) of which is due at execution of the Collins Stock Purchase Agreement as a non-refundable down payment, but which shall be credited against the Cash Consideration due at Closing, and



(ii) a Five (5) year, 8% Subordinated Promissory Note (the “Collins Note”) in the amount of Two million, five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000.00), with annual interest payable on a quarterly basis. The Note shall be fully subordinate to institutional lenders and debt investors

On November 6, 2007, the Company executed a letter of intent with Green Energy Technology, Inc. (“GET”) to enter into a share exchange, whereby, upon the development, execution and closing of a definitive agreement by November 30, 2007, 15,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company’s best efforts commitment to facilitate capital financing shall be exchanged for 100% of the common stock of GET, and GET will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. GET plans to realign the focus of the Company’s business from a technology-based producer of biodiesel fuel to a vertically integrated business comprised of: i) the procurement of low cost and diversified feedstock; ii) biodiesel fuel production using proven, established technologies; iii) the distribution of internally produced petro-biodiesel blended fuel; and iv) the research and development of future renewable, cost-beneficial feedstocks.


On July 25, 2007, Better Biodiesel, Inc. (“Better Biodiesel” or the “Company”) sustained a fire to its fuel processor which caused the Company to temporarily suspend fuel production at its 3 million gallons per year production facility in Spanish Fork, Utah. The Company intends to engage an independent engineering firm to analyze the condition and the required repairs of the Company’s fuel processor.


An inspection concluded that the fire was caused by a mechanical malfunction in a transfer line within the reactor section. The damage from the fire was isolated within the reactor container and no other parts of the fuel production plant were affected. The Company intends to repair the fire damaged portion of the processor and believes production could resume within 30-60 days. During this time, in addition to repairing the processor, the Company intends to raise additional capital to expand its production capabilities in order to deliver a higher quantity and quality of ASTM standard biodiesel fuel.



At the time of the incident the plant was being operated primarily to better optimize the design of a new 10 million gallons per year processor, which is the next step in the Company’s plan to fully build out the Spanish Fork site to produce 100 million gallons per year. The Company intends that the engineering firm will (i) evaluate the required repairs and assist the Company in bringing the plant back into production within the projected time frame and (ii) help finalize the design of the new processor



Also, on November 6, 2007, the Company executed a letter of intent with Ron Crafts, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, John Crawford, President, Chief Technology Officer and a Director of the Company, Lynn Dean Crawford, Chief Operations Officer of the Company, James Crawford, Mary Crafts, and Culinary Crafts, LLC., whereby common stock of the Company owned by Ron Crafts, John, James and Lynn Dean Crawford will be returned to the Company in exchange for: i) 100% of the membership interests in Domestic Energy Partners, LLC., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary (“DEP”); ii) all accounts, contracts, equipment, furnishings, miscellaneous personal property, fixtures, general intangibles, transferrable tax rebate certificates, documents and copyrights owned by the Company and/or DEP; iii) all of the rights, title and interest held in the invention indentified in the patent application assigned to the Company; iv) the Company’s Twin Cessna airplane; and v) all liabilities in connection with, or obligations owed to, Mr. Crafts, John, James and Lynn Dean Crawford and/or Culinary Crafts. Under this letter of intent, Ron Crafts, John Crawford and Lynn Dean Crawford will resign from their respective positions with the Company

wtez .60



http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?...ion=getcompany

Waste2Energy Group Holdings PLC, Waste2Energy Engineering Limited, Waste2Energy Technologies International Limited, (collectively referred to herein as (“W2E”) each of which are subsidiaries of Waste2Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a Manufacturing Agreement with SHBV (Hong Kong) LTD (“SHBV”), dated May 19, 2010 (the “Manufacturing Agreement”). The term of the Manufacturing Agreement is for ten years (from May 19, 2010), unless it is extended by W2E for an additional five years or it is terminated sooner pursuant to its terms. Pursuant to the Manufacturing Agreement W2E agreed that for the term of the Agreement it would grant SHBV an irrevocable and non-transferable license to manufacture components of W2E’s cBOS and sBOS products (the “W2E Products”) exclusively for W2E for use in all countries except Italy, Brazil, Canada and any other mutually agreed to exceptions (the “Territory”). In consideration for the exclusive right to manufacture the Products for use in the Territory SHBV agreed to make the following payments to W2E:



(i)

$1,000,000 will be made by June 17, 2010;

(ii)

$1,000,000 will be made by July 17, 2010;

(iii)

A further payment in kind of the necessary replacement equipment for the Dargavel EfW facility to complete the waste heat recovery system;

(iv)

The balance of up to $5,000,000 from i, ii, iii to be payable within 120 days of May 18, 2010 in the event of non conformance to (iii);

(v)

The balance of up to $5,000,000 shall be paid in equal installments annually over the remaining term of the agreement within 30 days of May 18th subject to the terms of the agreement.




The payment of the above-referenced payments is based on W2E’s achieving the minimum Quota. Pursuant to the Manufacturing Agreement, W2E is to place Cumulative Minimum Annual Orders of at least $60,000,000 in any one of the ten years of the term of the Manufacturing Agreement and not less than a total of $600,000,000 for the ten year term of the agreement.



Waste2Energy Group Holdings PLC and SHBV also entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated May 19, 2010 (the “Strategic Alliance Agreement”). The term of the Strategic Alliance Agreement is for ten years, unless terminated in accordance with the agreement. Pursuant to the Strategic Alliance Agreement, Waste2Energy Group Holdings PLC (“Holdings”) and SHBV are to promote and market the experience and capabilities of the other; identify, assess and communicate opportunities for Holdings; and undertake joint marketing initiatives and other marketing activities which are mutually beneficial for the business interests of Holdings and as shall be agreed to by Holdings and SHBV from time to time. Under the Strategic Alliance Agreement, Holdings agreed to use certain SHBV products for use with its customers.



The foregoing description of the Manufacturing Agreement and the Strategic Alliance Agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to these agreements which are attached as exhibits to this Current Report and are incorporated into this Item by reference.



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.



Exhibit


Number

Description


10.1

Manufacturing Agreement by and between SHBV (Hong Kong) LTD, Waste2Energy Group Holdings PLC, Wast2Energy Engineering Limited, and Waste2Energy Technologies International Limited


10.2

Strategic Alliance Agreement between Waste2Energy Group Holdings PLC and SHBV (Hong Kong) LTD


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


WASTE2ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: June 3, 2010
By:
/s/ Craig Brown

Name: Craig Brown

Title: Chief Financial Officer