HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › The Bible, Jesus and God - (we cant just go making things up)? a discussion
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Bible, Jesus and God - (we cant just go making things up)? a discussion - Page 6

post #101 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by BranRx View Post
Im not sure why you are hung up on the Trinity? Ive read the Bible, and it's not even mentioned, unless its in the Catholic bible. But yes you have God, You have God in the flesh and you have the Holy Spirit. So whats the last? I dont know no, energy maybe, the spirit of God? Who cares, its not even important. The only thing that counts is every word spoked by Jesus Christ in the New Testament, seriously in my opinion, you can toss the rest of the book, including revalations.
Wow. You get to pick and choose what to believe and not believe about the Bible? Imagine that.
post #102 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen1GT View Post
Only an idiot would believe in the Trinity...sorry.

Would you think I was an idiot of I still believed in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and Big Foot?

Also, how does it require faith to be an Atheist? That's kind of the opposite of what it means.
All but Simpleton concepts elude you?
Quote:
Question: "What does the Bible teach about the Trinity?"

Answer:
The most difficult thing about the Christian concept of the Trinity is that there is no way to adequately explain it. The Trinity is a concept that is impossible for any human being to fully understand, let alone explain. God is infinitely greater than we are; therefore, we should not expect to be able to fully understand Him. The Bible teaches that the Father is God, that Jesus is God, and that the Holy Spirit is God. The Bible also teaches that there is only one God. Though we can understand some facts about the relationship of the different Persons of the Trinity to one another, ultimately, it is incomprehensible to the human mind. However, this does not mean the Trinity is not true or that it is not based on the teachings of the Bible.

The Trinity is one God existing in three Persons. Understand that this is not in any way suggesting three Gods. Keep in mind when studying this subject that the word “Trinity” is not found in Scripture. This is a term that is used to attempt to describe the triune God—three coexistent, co-eternal Persons who make up God. Of real importance is that the concept represented by the word “Trinity” does exist in Scripture.



.
post #103 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
Wow. You get to pick and choose what to believe and not believe about the Bible? Imagine that.
No one said that... I'm not even sure how you came up with that... The Trinity is inferred without the specific word being mentioned...

And I forgot I responded to these and saved it on my desktop:

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgman27 View Post
No, it wasn't out of context.

I am not sure how you can put it any context without it being considered to be genocide.

God orders the murder of all the Amalakites in Samuel. He orders the death of all men, women and children.

"Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey" Samuel 15:3.
That request was for Saul and nobody else. Thanking you for proving my point by taking a piece of conversation and taking it out of context by misdirection. And since the birth of Jesus and the New Testament, God does not punish sin with death which makes your example completely irrelevant... You also fail to mention the preceeding verse: "'I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt." Apparently, the Amalekites weren't very nice and were indeed not the unfortunate, innocent bystanders of some random case of genocide...

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf825 View Post
Why? Anything that is claimed to BE historically accurate IS up to debate--because its accuracy, facts and claimed correct account of occurrences needs to be verified if it is expected to stand up to any scrutiny and eventually be held without 'question'. IMO the bible has not done that..and that may be personal view which would be an agree to disagree thing..at least for historical accuracy in purpose. For lesson learning purposes--it has exceeded any book published to date on the parable and moral lessons that should be looked at and learned from and weighed...but for accurate proven 'history'?
The writings of the Bible are congruent with many secular writings and archaeological findings; there are many parts of the Bible that are indeed viewed "without question". These accuracies, I believe, lend credibility towards the book as a whole. Granted, there are many "holes" in the Bible and parts that are both highly debated and considered far from fact. This is common with much of our ancient history. Regardless, the Bible is at least partially true. That is indisputable.

And, no offense, Jaz. But I consider random youtube videos in a religious debate to be about as "respectable" as Jon Stewart videos in a political debate... I did watch them and they're more of the same petty discrepancies that hinge on semantics and translation. For example, the first author chastises God for referring to a four-legged insect...which is odd because insect classification began about 6,000 years after that reference was made...and as Gould guesstimates, 99% of all plant and animal species that have existed have already become extinct with most leaving no fossils...(which also trumps the snake reference)... Frankly, pitting some random youtube videos against the best-selling book of all time, is rather ridiculous, imo.
post #104 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by 22rowdy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
Wow. You get to pick and choose what to believe and not believe about the Bible? Imagine that.
No one said that... I'm not even sure how you came up with that...
Right here...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BranRx View Post
The only thing that counts is every word spoked by Jesus Christ in the New Testament, seriously in my opinion, you can toss the rest of the book, including revalations.
Why even the existence of the Bible if one can disregard most of what has been written in it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 22rowdy View Post
And, no offense, Jaz. But I consider random youtube videos in a religious debate to be about as "respectable" as Jon Stewart videos in a political debate... I did watch them and they're more of the same petty discrepancies that hinge on semantics and translation. For example, the first author chastises God for referring to a four-legged insect...which is odd because insect classification began about 6,000 years after that reference was made...and as Gould guesstimates, 99% of all plant and animal species that have existed have already become extinct with most leaving no fossils...(which also trumps the snake reference)... Frankly, pitting some random youtube videos against the best-selling book of all time, is rather ridiculous, imo.
None taken. However, no source of material, Youtube or otherwise, presented in an effort to expose or refute the writings of the Bible would be accepted and would be completely disregarded by you and those whom "believe". No amount of evidence contrary to the Bible and it's documentation of history will be accepted by you and et al. If not Youtube videos done by people who have obviously put a lot of thought and research into the subject, then what material would you regard as acceptable? The God Delusion by the author and biologist Richard Dawkins? Would that be legitimate? An article in About.com titled Scientifically, God Does Not Exist: Science Allows us to Say God Does Not Exist. Is that enough? How about the numerous scientific publications that also conclude the similar sentiment. Do those work for you?

The fact of the matter, is that these debates do not influence one's belief system, or lack thereof. No amount of evidence, citing, or referencing is going to change your mind about the existence of God. Contrarily, no amount of referencing to the Bible, which is really all Christians have other than the support and backing of other Christians, is going to change my mind that there is not a God.
post #105 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
Wow. You get to pick and choose what to believe and not believe about the Bible? Imagine that.
Yeah, it makes us all Christians.

Which reminds me. I worked down in San Diego for 10 years and a good buddy of mine was Muslim (still is I imagine but havn't spoken to him in a few years). He insisted that we all worship the same God, we're all the same, etc.

I told him that Jesus is my God. He would reply with, "Actually, he was a prophet." and I would say, "Yes, we disagree, he's my God, not yours." and he would say, "No, he was a prophet, we all agree."

Almost like he wasn't listening to me, he would insist that he could call himself a Christian just as much as a Muslim, because Jesus was his prophet as well as Mohammed.
post #106 of 254
Quote:
The fact of the matter, is that these debates do not influence one's belief system, or lack thereof. No amount of evidence, citing, or referencing is going to change your mind about the existence of God. Contrarily, no amount of referencing to the Bible, which is really all Christians have other than the support and backing of other Christians, is going to change my mind that there is not a God.
If this is true, then how does one explain the many Atheists out there who claim to have once been a Christian and then "Saw the light"?

Or how does one explain the people like C.S. Lewis who were very outspoken in their Atheism and then claim to have reasoned themselves into a logical belief in God?

It seems to me that we humans, for the most part, are made up of two parts. Emotion and logic. And while it is often true that we allow ourselves to act and believe upon our emotional state, logic can eat away at that and convince of us things that would not normally be the case.

There are many scientists who believe in God and would tell you that it is the science that has lead them to that belief. There are many philosophers who would tell you that logical reasoning is what lead them to the inescapable conclusion of the existence of God.

None of that proves or disproves the existence of God.

I only state it in order to refute your assertion above.

These sorts of conversations act upon our minds in ways we do not predict. While our public persona often times shouts louder and louder that we are unconvinced, in private, we have our doubts and these discussions act to increase or decrease those doubts.
post #107 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baggi View Post
Yeah, it makes us all Christians.

Which reminds me. I worked down in San Diego for 10 years and a good buddy of mine was Muslim (still is I imagine but havn't spoken to him in a few years). He insisted that we all worship the same God, we're all the same, etc.
Technically he is correct.

The God of Moses, is the God of Abraham, is the same God that came down in the form of Jesus (his avatar!). This same God is also Allah.
post #108 of 254
So are you saying that it is possible that I could change your mind?
post #109 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockJock-e View Post
This same God is also Allah.
Are you sure?

Mohammad claims to be instructed by Allah to kill.
Must be mistaken Identity...

Clearly, a difference.



.
post #110 of 254
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
Wow. You get to pick and choose what to believe and not believe about the Bible? Imagine that.
No what Im saying is the Words of Christ are the most "holy." The closest thing to God himself. For me, it is all I need.
post #111 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen1GT
Only an idiot would believe in the Trinity...sorry.
While I dont agree often with you, I will give you this one.



Quote:
Originally Posted by StockJock-e
The God of Moses, is the God of Abraham, is the same God that came down in the form of Jesus.

While the first part is true, the part about God came down in the form of Jesus is not true, Jesus never claimed to be God, and did not send himself and resurrect himself. This belief that God and Jesus are the same supports a trinity, which is not supported by the bible or Jesus. He is Gods son.

I been trying to stay away from posting in this section, but its been awhile since Ive posted anything here. Just my input.
post #112 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
So are you saying that it is possible that I could change your mind?
Why would you want to? Besides this forum how have I affected your life? And even if you got all Christians to stop believing how would that help you?

I think it would hurt you. For instance(and I know I will catch heck for this but it's true) if I knew there was no God, no judgement, no afterlife, I would lie to better myself. I would have no problem divorcing my wife but staying with her to get all kinds of free money from the government. I could easily talk myself into it..like why no everyone else does it? Lots of things would change.
post #113 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting star View Post
Jesus never claimed to be God.
Several bible verses say otherwise.
post #114 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigcat View Post
Why would you want to? Besides this forum how have I affected your life? And even if you got all Christians to stop believing how would that help you?

I think it would hurt you. For instance(and I know I will catch heck for this but it's true) if I knew there was no God, no judgement, no afterlife, I would lie to better myself. I would have no problem divorcing my wife but staying with her to get all kinds of free money from the government. I could easily talk myself into it..like why no everyone else does it? Lots of things would change.
I fail to understand why it is that religious people believe we would all act like animals without religion or belief in a higher power. Without retyping it all over, allow me to quote myself:

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmm...Jaz View Post
I also disagree with the premise that it takes God and religion to know what's right or wrong. Again, this is an ideology that religion has usurped. Like in my previous post, we learn from our mistakes, not something that had to be handed down from a divine being. If my parent, or sibling, or offspring is murdered, I mourn. I am also angry, but I realize the tragedy of having lost, forever in an Atheist's view, someone beloved. Therefor, I have learned not to kill anyone. I know the immediate instinct would be to get revenge, and that is a fundamental basic human reaction based on the grief and anger of the loss. It takes a long time for the consequence and domino effect of murder and revenge to work it's way through the system until the culture is enlightened, and eventually leads to a mass understanding that it benefits no one to kill each other.

Unless, of course, you believe you still exist after death and are going to meet up with all previous lost loved ones, or 72 virgins. The belief in an afterlife is a suppressant to an appreciation of how precious life is, and we must protect it from the hands of those who have no respect for it.
Morality is something religion had usurped to claim it as their own. Like marriage, for example. Marriage was not a concept created by religion. But religion will capitalize and usurp anything that will allow them to exert more power over the general populace...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage

Quote:
Although the institution of marriage pre-dates reliable recorded history, many cultures have legends concerning the origins of marriage. The way in which a marriage is conducted has changed over time, as has the institution itself.

One of the oldest known and recorded marriage laws is discerned from * Hammurabi's Code, enacted in ancient Mesopotamia (widely considered as the cradle of civilization). The legal institution of marriage and its rules and ramifications have changed over time depending on the culture or demographic of the time.

Various cultures have had their own theories on the origin of marriage. One example may lie in a man's need for assurance as to paternity of his children. He might therefore be willing to pay a bride price or provide for a woman in exchange for exclusive sexual access. Legitimacy is the consequence of this transaction rather than its motivation. In Comanche society, married women work harder, lose sexual freedom, and do not seem to obtain any benefit from marriage. But nubile women are a source of jealousy and strife in the tribe, so they are given little choice other than to get married. "In almost all societies, access to women is institutionalized in some way so as to moderate the intensity of this competition." In English common law, a marriage was a voluntary contract by a man and a woman, in which by agreement they choose to become husband and wife. Edvard Westermarck proposed that "the institution of marriage has probably developed out of a primeval habit".
Quote:
* The Code of Hammurabi (Codex Hammurabi) is a well-preserved ancient law code, created ca. 1790 BC (middle chronology) in ancient Babylon. It was enacted by the sixth Babylonian king, Hammurabi. One nearly complete example of the Code survives today, inscribed on a seven foot, four inch tall diorite stele in the Akkadian language in the cuneiform script.
So you see, the first example of legal marriage was documented nearly a full 400 years before mention, or usurping of it, by the Bible.

I also understand the ridicule people get using Wiki references, so if required I can conduct further investigation and provide other sources that might be considered more legitimate, though Wiki is subject to scrutiny by peers and can be edited to reflect more accurate information.
post #115 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockJock-e View Post
Several bible verses say otherwise.
Not God almighty, there are many gods, as even satan is a god, but only one refered to as almighty, most high. That one that Jesus is placed at his right hand, the one that sent Jesus and resurrected him The one that jesus prayed to, as he was not praying to him self. The reason the trinity is so hard to explain is there is no trinity, only a man made doctrine or deciever.
You and your Father my resemble each other but you are not the same
person. I will be happy to consider scriptures that you feel support Jesus claiming to be God most high. I sincerly am not trying to be rude, just sharing my insight on the subject.
post #116 of 254
I remember I tried to create a thread like this previously, and it turned out exactly the same way that this one did. To be honest, a lot of the posts here (from both sides) make me cringe when I read them.

Rather than calling anyone out or continuing to argue in circles, I'd recommend that both non-Christians and Christians alike read The Reason For God by Tim Keller, a pastor at Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York (and in my and many others' opinions, one of the most theologically sound preachers in the world today). As someone noted before, there seem to be a lot of misconceptions flying around - both from the believers and the non-believers. This book does a pretty good job of addressing a lot of the arguments against Christianity as well as clearing up a lot of these misconceptions.

In addition, for all the Christians out there, I'd recommend another Keller book in addition to the first. I think that The Prodigal God does a great job of presenting the Gospel in a fresh way to believers who may have grown cold over the years. As Paul the Apostle writes, we should "[resolve] to know nothing... except Jesus Christ and him crucified."

Hope this post doesn't come across as "holier than thou" or anything like that. Just wanted to try to offer some clarity to the conversation. If you don't have the funds to buy the book or you just don't feel like going through the trouble, I'd be glad to explain as much as I can with my limited knowledge. Just shoot me a PM. See y'all around.
post #117 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigcat View Post
Why would you want to? Besides this forum how have I affected your life? And even if you got all Christians to stop believing how would that help you?

I think it would hurt you. For instance(and I know I will catch heck for this but it's true) if I knew there was no God, no judgement, no afterlife, I would lie to better myself. I would have no problem divorcing my wife but staying with her to get all kinds of free money from the government. I could easily talk myself into it..like why no everyone else does it? Lots of things would change.
I guess I'd better go tell my wife and kids I'm leaving them to go on welfware and sell crack. Us Atheists obviously have no character without religion. I'd better go sully up my criminal record by committing my first crime, and then maybe go get my first speeding ticket while I'm at it.
post #118 of 254
If you were any more pernicious your title would be Mephistopheles the Tempter!
post #119 of 254
First I never said I would turn into an animal. I figured you guys would run with it when I said that.

It does not matter what you believe. The fact is a lot of people do not lie because it's a sin. There are tons of "white lies". Do you lie to women so you can sleep with them Jaz? I'm not saying without religion they would run around killing people but they would start to lie more, when they saw fit to. There would be nothing stopping them from instant gratification Etc.

And yes most atheist have no character. Whoa! you say? They may not call themselves atheist but IMO a person does not have to join or call themselves one to be one. IMO Joe bank robber, gang banger, and scumbag are atheist because they do not believe in God.

And I never said you could not hold morals if you are athiest.
post #120 of 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen1GT View Post
I guess I'd better go tell my wife and kids I'm leaving them to go on welfware and sell crack. Us Atheists obviously have no character without religion. I'd better go sully up my criminal record by committing my first crime, and then maybe go get my first speeding ticket while I'm at it.
yet if you found your life at the mercy of someone else you would probably be just like the rest who scream 'oh god help me'.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Politics
HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › The Bible, Jesus and God - (we cant just go making things up)? a discussion