or Connect
HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › “No ObamaNation”
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

“No ObamaNation” - Page 83

post #1641 of 1878
Thread Starter 


Originally Posted by theone View Post

I am not even going to address this tripe... I read just the first few words and then I realized that by engaging you I am actually appeasing your fallacious red herring... I gave you a lesson in that fallacious tactic once and I won't do it again... come again if you have something to discuss regarding the topic at hand, otherwise... you know...


    IS THAT A PROMISE ...??   booyah.gif banana.gif  banana.gif  booyah.gif




post #1642 of 1878
Originally Posted by 2SHEA View Post


    IS THAT A PROMISE ...??   booyah.gif banana.gif  banana.gif  booyah.gif




I certainly hope so, since you wrote it... hmmm and you are the type of jackass the American people are to count on when the time comes (well, the time has come and gone, long ago, but anyhow...) to band together and exercise the 2nd ammendment? yikes, thank my lucky stars I don't live in America!

post #1643 of 1878
Thread Starter 

This presentation won't make a lick of sense to Liberals or anyone who hasn't been following my posts.

But to those who have, the words spoken in the video will remind them of what I and others have been

saying for years. Our present "De facto" government is rapidly collapsing! Long live our "New Republic"!


post #1644 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Two faux Conservatives and a crazy Anarchist ...what a choice!


The MSM have been tirelessly promoting Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich to win the 2012 nomination but the voting public is fed up with these closet Liberals, their deceptive tactics, and all their fraudulent rhetoric to make themselves look good. Mitt and Newt BOTH have proven that they will continue the "status quo" if either one of them are elected!  (same shit - same party - different title) Mitt wants to run the US into the ground like he did to Massachusetts. (one of the the most Liberal states in the union!) Newt Gingrich has Leftist ideologies and a hidden, Liberal leaning past that scares the hell out of Constitutionalists. (Newt wants to give the Patriot Act "unlimited authority") Ron Paul is in the lead for awhile but don't let the phony polls fool you. He would try to APPEASE our enemies, but without bowing to them like Obama. Ron Paul would soon be perceived as a weak leader, unwilling to use force until it was absolutely necessary. By then, the mushroom clouds from Iranian made suitcase bombs would already be rising in major cuties across America! Mr. Paul is many things, but conservative is not one of them.


Ron Paul is a full blown Libertarian. One part conservative, two parts anarchist and 100% Politically Correct!


Mitt and Newt are losing ground because people are investigating their past policies, don't like what they've found and are refusing to believe what either of them says, regardless of their schmoozing speeches or the bilge being pumped to us by the talking heads. Ron Paul won't be nominated because of his "Neville Chamberlain" approach to foreign policy, abandoning Israel, not wiling to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, a disturbing indifference to the threat of radical Islam, approves of open homosexuality in the military and would legalize the use of HARD drugs by "adults"! Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and John Huntsman are the only ones left to choose from. It's a foregone conclusion that ObaHomo and his Marxist/Communist, Cloward - Piven and Saul Alinsky strategies are wrecking the economy and he SHOULD be gone after the first term unless he gets arrested for multiple Felonies, Fraud, Theft, Treason and failure to uphold his "Oath of Office" before the November election. There's a lot mistrust hanging over Gingrich and Romney. It wouldn't be surprising if Ron Paul wins Iowa, then LOSES support from there on. That would leave Bachmann and Perry at the top to fight it out. Huntsman and Santorum might as well drop out. They can barely maintain their single digit positions and will never get anywhere in the media. Perry or Bachmann are two Conservatives that would definitely turn this country around.


If Barry-the-Fairy gets re-elected ... KYAGB!


If Newt, or Mitt  get elected ...  "Soft Tyranny"


If Ron is elected ... ?? yrs of WTF ... Is he losing his mind?

post #1645 of 1878
Thread Starter 

The end of America: House and Senate pass final version of NDAA  H.R. 1540.




This represents the complete destruction of everything that America is supposed to stand for, the most essential of rights have been stripped away and we are left wondering what the traitors in Washington will do next.It has become painfully clear that the true terrorists are not hiding in caves in Afghanistan shooting at NATO troops with rusted second-hand assault rifles, but instead wear $5,000 suits and stroll happily through the halls of power in the United States. The House passed their final version of the NDAA with a massive majority of 283 to 136 and the Senate passed it with a vote of 86 to 13, once again proving that our so-called Representatives do not represent us in any way and in fact are traitorous criminals and enemies of freedom. No longer do we need to fear our country being attacked by foreign forces hell bent on destroying the American way of life, as these forces can be found calling themselves our “Representatives” while living large on the backs of the American people.


The signing of the NDAA with the detention provisions – that is, sections 1031 and 1032 most importantly – intact represents the final nail in the coffin of our once Constitutional Republic. I can honestly say that I previously thought that the PATRIOT Act would be the worst legislation I would ever see in my lifetime and quite unfortunately, I was wrong. Dead wrong. As I said when first covering S.1253, the precursor to S.1867 which the Senate passed with a 93% majority, this legislation makes the PATRIOT Act look like the Bill of Rights, and that is not in any way hyperbolic. I previously exposed the fact that the claim that Obama would veto the NDAA was wholly without merit, and unfortunately I have been proven right  once again when the White House withdrew the veto threat completely. With the detention provisions intact, and thus the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or trial on nothing more than suspicion, the NDAA is the most dangerous legislation to come before the President in recent history.


Some have attempted to amend the NDAA to explicitly protect American citizens and lawful permanent residents from being targeted, but to no avail. This is the most major problem with so many proponents’ arguments: if they did not intend to leverage this against the American people, especially dissidents who are standing up to the rampant corruption and pervasive police state measures, why wouldn’t they pass such an amendment?


The answer is quite obvious, really. They have every intention of using this against so-called “belligerents” which could be anyone who refuses to bow down to the megalomaniacal ruling class, including people like myself who explicitly reject any and all forms of violence. When the NDAA is signed by the President – which is all but ironclad at this point – it will only be a short time until the military can begin rounding up American citizens and the FEMA camps could be activated and utilized thanks to KBR’s National Quick Response Teams. Yet there is indeed a silver lining to this nightmarish cloud, although I’m still holding back from jumping for joy at this point. This last bastion of hope is known as the “Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011” which was proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California. The bill is intended, “To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States”.


The bill is intended to amend Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, known as the “Limitation on detention; control of prisons”. The bill would insert the following after subsection (a), “(b)(1) An authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States apprehended in the United States, unless an Act of Congress expressly authorizes such detention. “(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011.”


Sounds great, doesn’t it? Well, there are still a few glaring problems, the most major of which is that this only applies to American citizens and lawful permanent residents who are apprehended within the United States. Furthermore, it only protects us so long as an Act of Congress does not expressly authorize such detention. Given the fact that the Congress has already betrayed us in passing the NDAA, can we really rely on hoping that they wouldn’t pass an Act nullifying the Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011, if it indeed passes? I think such a hope would not only be misguided and naïve but indeed ignorant and divorced from the reality which has presented itself to us in the past months. Moreover, we are relying on what is arguably an equally nonsensical hope: that the Senate – which voted with a massive majority in favor of the NDAA both times – would actually vote for the Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011.


I, for one, am not going to hold my breath in hopes that they will come through and do the right thing as they have proven that they are some of the most untrustworthy, despicable individuals all too well as of late. Another major problem for me is that Feinstein, who unfortunately is one of my so-called Representatives, actually voted for the NDAA as you can see in the Senate’s roll call for today’s vote. She also voted in favor of S.1867, the Senate’s version of the NDAA. Can we really expect her to pass something that will protect us after actively working against us in such a blatant manner?


I think not, and unless there is a massive change in how our government views the American people I do not expect to see positive events unfold as a result. However, the future is ours to determine at this point and the situation could unfold in any number of ways. Either we could see the most hellish police state imaginable with Americans being arrested and detained indefinitely by the military for any reason or no reason at all, or we could see the military step up and honor their oaths and refuse unlawful orders and arrest those who issued them, or we could see a second American revolution.


It is impossible to say which we will see, but I hope that the military will pause and remember their sworn oaths and who the real enemies are. “We the People” are not the enemies of the Constitution; instead it is those traitors in Washington who would love to see nothing other than all of our most essential liberties stripped away in the name of fighting the fraudulent war on terror.


Hopefully the military would realize this and act accordingly, or else the situation would likely be one in which the vast majority of people in the United States would suffer for an unimaginable length of time.

post #1646 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Update: Hawaii Judge Grants Expedited Hearing for Atty. Orly Taitz


by Sharon Rondeau


(Jan. 10, 2012) — Atty. Orly Taitz has reported on her website that Judge Rhonda Nishimura has granted Taitz’s request to expedite a hearing originally scheduled for January 26, when Taitz must be in Georgia for a ballot challenge hearing.

Nishimura’s new order is here.

The new date is Friday, January 13, at 10:30 a.m., for which Taitz will be making her fifth trip to Hawaii since filing the case Taitz v. Fuddy.  Dr. Alvin Onaka, Registrar at the Hawaii Department of Health, was also named a defendant.


Nishimura had determined that a hearing on the “new matter” of a subpoena from Georgia had to be scheduled separately from the last hearing held on January 6.  Judge Michael Malihi had signed a subpoena which was sent to Hawaii commanding the Health Department to release the original vault copy of Obama’s birth certificate. Taitz’s case in that state questions whether or not Obama qualifies as a “natural born Citizen” as required for the presidency in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution.


Taitz reported that Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine had stated that Hawaii was not obligated to honor a subpoena from another state.  Atty. Van Irion told The Post & Email that Judge Malihi could have the officials in Hawaii arrested and jailed if they refused to comply based on the Full Faith and Credit clause of the U.S. Constitution.


Nagamine had earlier asked that cameras not be allowed in Nishimura’s courtroom.  Nagamine is attempting to defend her client’s right to refuse to release Obama’s purported original birth certificate following a subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court in Honolulu.


Malihi also signed a similar subpoena directed to “Mr. Barrack Hussein Obama” at the White House, commanding him to produce “Any and all certified birth records, certified long form birth certificate, certified school/university registration records, certified immigration/naturalization records, certified passport records and redacted certified SS-5 applications under the names Barack (Barry) Soetoro, Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, Barack (Barry) Obama, and any and all combinations of thereof and any other names used.”  Taitz stated that that subpoena has been sent to Obama’s Georgia attorney, Michael Jablonski.


Of the judge’s decision, Taitz told The Post & Email, “She just expedited the hearing; it still does not mean that she will grant it,” meaning the Motion for Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement.




post #1647 of 1878
Thread Starter 



By Chuck Baldwin
January 12, 2012



Another Bill To Turn American Citizens Into Enemies Of The State

On the heels of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), otherwise known as the "Indefinite Detention Act," comes another draconian bill designed to give the federal government the power to turn American citizens into enemies of the state for virtually any reason it deems necessary. Stephen D. Foster, Jr. has the story.

"Congress is considering HR 3166 and S. 1698 also known as the Enemy Expatriation Act, sponsored by Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Charles Dent (R-PA). This bill would give the US government the power to strip Americans of their citizenship without being convicted of being 'hostile' against the United States. In other words, you can be stripped of your nationality for 'engaging in, or purposefully and materially supporting, hostilities against the United States.' Legally, the term 'hostilities' means any conflict subject to the laws of war but considering the fact that the War on Terror is a little ambiguous and encompassing, any action could be labeled as supporting terrorism."

Foster goes on to say, "I hope I'm wrong, but it sounds to me like this is a loophole for indefinitely detaining Americans. Once again, you just have to be accused of supporting hostilities which could be defined any way the government sees fit. Then the government can strip your citizenship and apply the indefinite detention section of the NDAA without the benefit of a trial."

See Foster's report.

Ever since Congress passed the Patriot Act back in 2001, it seems the floodgates have been opened for more and more intrusions and abridgements of those fundamental liberties expressly protected in the Bill of Rights. From the Patriot Act, to the Military Commissions Act, to the NDAA (Indefinite Detention Act), and to now the Enemy Expatriation Act (EEA), these big government toadies in Washington, D.C., are clearly and unmistakably declaring war on the American people.

I invite readers to see my column on the NDAA.

Have we forgotten the MIAC report out of the State of Missouri back in 2009? In that official State report, supporters of Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin were identified as potential dangerous "militia members," and Missouri State law enforcement officials were notified to be on guard. Beyond that, anyone that identified themselves as being pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, anti-Federal Reserve, Christians who believe in the return of Christ, and even returning Iraq War veterans were likewise targeted as potentially dangerous to Missouri State law enforcement personnel.

After the MIAC report surfaced, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and I sent a letter to the governor of Missouri demanding that the report be removed and that the State of Missouri repudiate the report. After a firestorm of outrage by thousands of Americans all over the country (not just in Missouri) the State of Missouri did indeed remove and repudiate the report.

Totalitarian regimes throughout history have attempted to marginalize those people that the state intended to target for persecution. Once a group or groups of people had been sufficiently marginalized, it wasn't long before public condemnation and then military retaliation took place. Legislation such as the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the NDAA, and now the EEA authorize military power to be used against US citizens, and given the propensity of government propagandists in the National Press Corps to marginalize groups of people whose ideas are thought to be politically incorrect, it's only a matter of time before the executive branch of the federal government begins utilizing the dictatorial powers that have been granted to it by Congress. And, unfortunately, many State governments seem more than willing to participate in the Machiavellian machinations put forward by Washington, D.C. The MIAC report in the State of Missouri is a prime example.

Sadder still is the way so many Christian pastors and churches have become little more than glorified cheerleaders for Statism and Militarism. While the Trojan Horse of Big Government sits unnoticed in Town Square, so-called Christians spend most of their time either trying to kill each other because of differences of opinion over secondary doctrines, or trying to turn their worship services into miniature versions of Walt Disney World.

I ask you, did you hear anything from your pastor regarding NDAA? Did you hear anything from your pastor regarding the Patriot Act or the Military Commissions Act? If not, do you really think you will hear him say anything about the EEA? Again I ask you, are not the fundamental principles of liberty as valuable and as scriptural as the so-called "family values" we hear pastors talk so much about? I would argue that without the under-girding foundational principles of liberty (codified in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights), the so-called "family values" would become moot very quickly! Before Hitler's government could begin marching people off to concentration camps, it had to destroy the foundational elements of liberty in the hearts and minds of the German people--including German pastors and churches. A government that doesn't respect your liberty will not respect your life, your family, your religion, or your morality!

At this point, I invite readers to watch my address from last Sunday, January 8, 2012. In this address, I deal forthrightly with the NDAA and show the scriptural instruction regarding how unlawful and illegitimate government is the chief source of "tribulation" that the Bible talks so much about. I also give a scriptural outline as to how Christian people are to relate and respond to government--both good and bad. Watch my Sunday address here.

While we are on the topic of liberty, someone has produced a fascinating clip of Congressman Ron Paul showing the predictions he made on the floor of the US House of Representatives back in 2002--along with the fulfillment of those predictions in subsequent news headlines. People who view this brief You Tube video might just begin to understand why Congressman Paul is the only Presidential candidate who truly understands the causes of this loss of liberty taking place in our land. See Dr. Paul's speech on the House floor.


Given the way congressmen and senators from both major parties are willing to grant dictatorial powers to the President, it seems likely that the EEA will pass in much the same way as did the NDAA. It seems to me that the longer we keep expecting Washington, D.C., to solve our problems, the more our problems will increase. Remember the sagacious words of President Ronald Reagan: "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." Listen to that quote here.


If we are going to "guard and defend" (Daniel Webster) our liberties, it is going to take states and local communities to do it, because those miscreants in Washington, D.C., are doing everything they can to dismantle our liberties, not protect them. We need State governors, lieutenant governors, attorney generals, and sheriffs to stand in the gap NOW! And in that vein, I invite readers to follow the Fanning-Baldwin Montana gubernatorial campaign at the following Facebook and Twitter pages.

In the meantime, beware! The Enemy Expatriation Act is coming soon, and with the way things are going, YOU could be deemed the enemy!



post #1648 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Indefinite Detention: The NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act


post #1649 of 1878
Thread Starter 



Pursuant to OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.19, Defendant Barack Obama is hereby notified to be and appear before the

Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, the Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding,at the Fulton County

Justice Center Building, 161 Pryor Street, Courtroom G-40, Atalanta, Georgia on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.,and

to bring with him into said Court the following items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case:

(a) One (1) of the two (2) original

certified copies of Defendant Barack Obama's ("long form") Certificate of Live Birth as referenced in the four (4) pages of Exhibit "A" attached;

(b) All medical, religious, administrative, or other records of or related to Defendant Barack Obama's birth;

(c) Any and all United States Passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama;

(d) Any and all passport, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama from any country, nation, or sovereignty;

(e) Any and all college and university admission information, both undergraduate and postgraduate, for Defendant Barack Obama, including, but not limited to, admission applications; letters of recommendation; school transcripts; financial aid applications; scholarship applications; and any and all correspondence awarding admission, financial aid, scholarships, or the like;

(f) Any and all applications and accompanying materials submitted by or for Defendant Barack Obama to the State Bar of Illinois, the State Supreme Court of Illinois, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and any other similar entity regulating the admission to the practice of law;

(g) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant Barack Obama;

(h) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant's father, Barack Obama Sr.

(i) All correspondence between Defendant Barack Obama and any other person, firm, political party, or entity discussing Defendant's status *vel non* as a natural born Citizen pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.


Defendant will note that the preceding items are requested hereby, whether they pertain to Defendant under his name Barack Obama or any other name, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Obama II; Barry Soetoro; Barry Soebarkah; Barry Obama, or the like.


*VEL NON ... A term used by the courts in reference to the existence or nonexistence

of an issue for determination; for example: "We come to the merits vel non ...



post #1650 of 1878
Thread Starter 



Yesterday, Georgia OSAH conducted a hearing to determine if Barack Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah will be allowed to register for the March primary Presidential election. Since neither BHO or any of his representative Attorneys bothered to attend the hearing as ordered, the presiding judge, Honorable Michael M. Malihi stated he would enter a "default judgement" against BHO and that an appeal would be useless since the defendant (BHO) "failed to appear, in direct contempt of a court order" with the requested documents. The Secretary of State indicated that he would abide by the judgement handed down from the court and strike Obama's name from the Georgia ballot. Al, Tn, Ky, and several other states are expected to follow Georgia's example after the courts decision. Finally, the issue of ObaHomo and the mystery behind his hidden documentation are drawing some overdue attention from an honest judge! It will be very interesting to see how many follow-up charges arise from this "eligibility hearing", including FRAUD,  I.D. THEFT, FALSE OATH, TREASON, MISPRISION OF FELONY, etc...Investigations of the people responsible for "vetting" BHO should begin ASAP, along with ALL the politicians and Judges who refused to acknowledge concerns about his Constitutional eligibility. After sentencing the 'perps' responsible for this nightmare, it'll be so vindicating watching the Obots scurry back under their rocks in shame for ever being foolish enough to worship their Mulatto Messiah and call his detractors ... "birthers"... Bwaaaahahahahaha ...  Sweet Justice!

post #1651 of 1878
Thread Starter 



A Georgia judge has rejected a complaint that sought to keep President Barack Obama off the state's ballot for next month's presidential primary.

Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi filed his decision Friday. The complaint contended Obama isn't a natural-born U.S. citizen and therefore should not be on the state's ballot. Malihi said in his decision that it has been determined that Obama was born in the U.S.

Similar complaints have been filed in other states with no success.

Obama's local attorney Michael Jablonski did not attend a hearing last week in Atlanta. Plaintiff's attorneys urged Malihi to hold him and the president in contempt. The judge said in his decision he doesn't condone Jablonski's conduct but did not hold him or the president in contempt.


Not a word about it on the MSM ...

but as soon as it was determined that ObaMessiah would still be on the Ga ballot, EVERY station reports it!



post #1652 of 1878

Gov. Zell Miller (D) appointed Malihi as a judge in 1995. 

Miller is an old south segregationist and one-time Chief of Staff for Georgia governor Lester Maddox.

Can't you just smell the crosses burning?

I think the KKK got Played.



Not really - communists are everywhere.


The key is NOT the birth certificate as I have told you before.

THE KEY IS the widely bragged about fact that Obama was

Tutored by Frank Marshall-Communist.  Everything else is

linked to that .....


... It's the school records and term papers detailing the destruction

of this country to ensure capitalism is permenently damaged.




was founded by Armand Hammer - Owner of Occidental Petroleum? 

Armand was also very closely tied to the communists in the USSR.



Man - you can't make this shit up.


Edited by Techunter - 2/5/12 at 12:22am
post #1653 of 1878

Obama admits he's not an American born citizen!



post #1654 of 1878
Thread Starter 

I stated in post (#1650) "Al, Tn, Ky, and several other states are expected to follow Georgia's example after the courts decision." ... 

Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, Judge Michael M. Malihi and Secretary of State, Mr. Brian Kemp both failed

miserably in their administrative duties to remove a known FRAUD ... Barack Obama/Soetoro/Sobarkah from the Georgia 2012

Presidential election ballot. It appears from this new complaint that the Mocha Messiah's golfing/vacationing days are about over.


Yesterday, in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Distinct in Leon County Florida, another ballot challenge was filed by

Michael C Voeltz, represented by Atty: Larry Klayman. After reading the ENTIRE 36 page PDF of the complaint, it seems that

Mr Klayman did a LOT of research into Florida statutes and found some damning evidence against the State legislature, Florida

Secretary of State Kurt Browning and the Florida Elections Canvassing Commission! He explains in detail the inherent corruption

written into the "laws" governing their vetting process and found that ANYONE could be on the ballot even if they were ineligible!


Attorney Klayman cites several Supreme Court cases pertaining to "natural born Citizen" and clearly describes why our putative

faux POTUS doesn't meet the eligibility outlined in Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S Constitution. If the Circuit Court Judge

decides to subpoena documents and Obama refuses ... the jigs up!  Attorney Klayman was very thorough researching this case

and his presentation of the complaint makes the Georgia judge and Orly Taitz look like pathetic amateurs. All the arguments and

excuses pertaining to the DNC's "altered" nomination form signed by Nancy Pelosi, Florida legislators enacting "CYA" laws into

effect in May 2011, the Federal Candidate Oath and other anomalies will have the Obots pissing and moaning for a long time!


This is really an interesting legal paper to read ... impressive and professionally written ... it goes right for the jugular!

Not only does he excoriate Judge Malihi and SoS Kemp ... he rips into the Florida Democratic party and legislature too!





post #1655 of 1878
Thread Starter 

It's happening! popcorn.gif Multi state ballot challenges! MSM is silent!  hmm.gif

1) Florida ... Ballot Challenge - Voeltz Pleading -  2/15/12



2) Georgia ... Attorney Files Appeal in Superior Court 2/15/12

Swensson v Obama, Petition for Judicial Review,

Georgia Ballot Access Challenge,




Attorney Mark Hatfield Appeals Judge Michael Malihi's Rulings

with the Fulton County Superior Court



3) Pennsylvania ... Kerchner & Laudenslager v Obama -

Nomination Petition Objection Filed in PA Court 2/17/12

News Conference Scheduled for 3 pm Friday the 17th











post #1656 of 1878

Wait for the


OF "truth".






It's was planned all along...












post #1657 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Mississippi ... Order Appointing Special Judge - Supreme Court of Mississippi - 2/17/2012





SCOTUS Meeting on Feb. 17 to Discuss Health Care/Eligibility Challenge




Indiana ... next state for Obama eligibility protest - 2/24/12

Secretary of state already has been removed over qualifications

And there appear to be other state challenges lined up to follow even that one, including pending cases in Mississippi and Arizona.



post #1658 of 1878

E-Verify on Obama yields SSN mismatch notice




post #1659 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Missouri wimps out ... legislature derides HB-1046 eligibility bill as "birther inspired" ... rejected !


Rep. Lyle Rowland's recycled birther bill was voted out of the House Elections Committee yesterday morning by a 7-2-1 vote.  Representatives Tony Dugger, Sue Entlicher, Mike Cierpiot, Stanley Cox, Don Gosen, Myron Neth and Don Wells all voted to further embarrass Missouri and their party.  

Stacey Newman and Joe Fallert were the lone opposition votes. 

Pat Conway boldly voted present. 


Kansas ... Introduced H-B 2224 2/08/12 ... Amendments to KSA 25-2309 puts fangs in eligibility laws!


Within 10 days after the submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit proof that such candidates are natural born citizens of the United States by providing a document or a photocopy of such document listed in paragraphs (1) through (13) of K.S.A. 25-2309(l), and amendments thereto, to the secretary of state, or by seeking an assessment of evidence of United States citizenship by the state election board pursuant to K.S.A. 25-2309(m), and amendments thereto.

If the national political party does not submit the United States citizenship documents to the secretary of state or seek an assessment of evidence of United States citizenship by the state election board as required by this subsection, the secretary of state shall not place those candidates' names on the ballot in this state.


It will only require ONE STATE to deny Obozo a slot in the primary to start an electoral brush fire in the rest of the country. So far, there are THREE states with active lawsuits directly challenging the fraud in our White House and TWO more enacting legislation that seek to prevent his re-election. Sooner or later, the fudge packing Mack-daddy will have time to "sing the blues" at Leavenworth or Gitmo ... waiting for an appropriate execution. If the courts or the state legislatures are over-ruled in this matter, we'll find ourselves facing the same imposition that our Forefathers did in 1776 ...

post #1660 of 1878
Thread Starter 

Corrupt Georgia Superior Court Dismisses

Legal Appeal Of Obama Eligibility Ruling

The Georgia Superior Court Clerk’s office did everything in its power to thwart the very filing of a legal appeal in  Weldon v Obama,the case in which Judge Michael Malihi ruled that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore eligible for the Georgia ballot.

And the Superior Court itself has just dismissed plaintiff David Weldon’s appeal of that ruling.

The numerous questions surrounding Malihi’s February 3rd decision and the clear errors of law and procedure upon which it was based have been discussed by countless members of the new media.

And now Van Irion,head counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) and the attorney who represented David Weldon in his lawsuit questioning Obama’s eligibility before Judge Malihi,relates what has happened since the decision.

The story he tells of improper and illegal conduct on the part of the Superior Court arguably reveals a more blatant and callous disregard for the law and the rights of the American people than was displayed in the ruling itself.

Irion relates that:

  • Malihi’s Georgia Court refuses to forward LLF’s Motion for Contempt against Obama to the Georgia Superior Court despite state law providing the Court no such discretion.
  • The Superior Court refused to respond to LLF’s letters on the matter,or demand the Malihi court forward the Motion.
  • The Superior Court Clerk initially refused to file LLF’s Appeal of Malihi’s ruling,relenting only after 48 solid hours of legal and procedural “education” on the part of Irion.
  • The Superior Court Clerk refused to file LLF’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction because a $1 filing fee had not been included. After HAND DELIVERY of $1,the Clerk then SAT ON the Motion for 10 days,finally claiming the $1 fee had been hand delivered to the “wrong staffer.” The Motion had to be completely re-filed. The Court itself refused to admonish the clerk.

And here is the clincher:

  • Obama filed a Motion to Dismiss LLF’s Appeal of the Malihi ruling and the Motion was FILED IMMEDIATELY by the Superior Court Clerk. Obviously no problem in the Clerk’s office with Mr. Obama’s paper work.
  • THREE DAYS after Obama’s Motion to Dismiss was filed,the Court informed Attorney Van Irion that he had LESS THAN 1 DAY to file an Opposition to that Motion;thoroughly improper behavior on the part of the Court.
  • Late that SAME DAY,the Chief Judge of the Superior Court denied Irion’s motion to be admitted as a visiting attorney (Irion practices in Tennessee) in spite of his impeccable reputation and the fact that his Georgia sponsor is a member of the Georgia State Legislature who has practiced before the Court! The Court had deliberately held up this particular decision for 2 weeks,effectively preventing LLF from filing the Opposition the Court had RULED only 6 hours earlier that LLF must file on that day! All of this represents unheard of behavior on the part of a court.
  • Finally,just 90 minutes after plaintiff David Weldon personally filed the Opposition–as the Court had prevented Irion and LLF from doing so–the Chief Judge issued a 3 page Opinion granting Obama’s Motion to Dismiss the LLF Appeal!

Incredibly,neither Judge Malihi nor the Secretary of State sent the Weldon v Obama case record to the Superior Court for review until AFTER the Court had ruled in Obama’s favor!  That means the Chief Judge agreed to Obama’s Motion to Dismiss an Appeal of a case the Judge NEVER READ!! This is the extent to which judicial corruption has replaced judicial review in the State of Georgia.

Moreover,given the Judge’s Opinion was produced just 90 minutes after the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss was filed, it is obvious that the Court had decided to grant Obama’s Motion and probably had its Opinion prepared before ever considering the Opposition argument. LLF’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction,the Opposition AND the Contempt Motion against Obama for failure to appear at the Malihi hearing,ALL were completely ignored by the Georgia “legal” system.

In short,the FIX WAS IN as the Superior Court of Fulton County had undoubtedly decided there would be clear sailing for the White House Manchurian Candidate immediately after Michael Malihi made his ruling one month earlier. And the legal rights of plaintiff David Weldon,the people of Georgia and of the United States are casualties of the corrupt behavior exhibited by members of the Georgia judicial system.

Van Irion writes,“The Founding Fathers understood that when dishonorable people begin to take high office,the system of government they set into motion would begin to fail. Unfortunately America’s judicial system is proving this principle.”


Liberty Legal is preparing an Appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court. Will it matter? We can only hope that,for the sake of the American legal system and the American people, Mr. Irion will find at least ONE honest judge in the State of Georgia. Time will tell.


New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Politics
HotStockMarket › Forums › Community › Politics › “No ObamaNation”