EESO - Enzyme Environmental Solutions Inc - Page 100

I guess you thought that addressed to you, huh?

The only thing you have to offer is a huge waste of space on my 13" laptop LCD screen.

You act like it's so easy to pull off a scam like EESO.

"Look they've got fake buildings, and fake employees, and everything; they even got the original founder of Little Caesar's Pizza to come to their fake Open House and tell lies about fake contracts! Can you believe that? They even had that same dude put up a fake Wowgreen website and host a fake sold-out conference in Detroit for the launch of their new fake products! That's where all the investor money is going! They have to pay all these people to put up all these fake pictures with fake South Koreans and huge fake vats of hog crap! They host fake conference calls and do fake interviews on Investor Nation all the time! It's a scam I tell you! It's all fake, all of it! I can't prove it or fathom how much all of that fake stuff would cost, BUT I'M SURE OF IT!

This just in: 1,200 people were just indicted and arrested for involvement in a pink sheet stock scam. They turned themselves in after they spent all the money they stole trying to pay for the scam.

Listen to yourself, man. Does that not sound a tad ridiculous? Find a new thread, jeez.

fact -if there are any EESO rags to riches stories, they won't be found on message boards... if I made a million dollars from nothing on this or any other POS I sure as f*** would have better things to do than post on message boards...

I made tons on EESO, playing all those bullshit prs and they are bullshit, if you think otherwise your reading comprehension sucks or you just interpret the English language to suit your own speculative view of what you hope this company will do one way or another, the prs and the company's corresponding actions make the bullshit extrememly clear. EESO longterm? Why because a handful of lotto playing trailer folk bought some triple zero POS and got LUCKY??? Now they are all investment experts??? Seriously give it a rest. I can think of a atleast a hundred other places where I'd rather put large sums of money long-term and EESO ain't one of them, but like I said, it HAS been good to me to play off this pr machine, but, as history has shown us, dilluting with prs is almost as effective as dilluting with more shares, the prs are losing their sting... GO EESO

I've seen you reference people who live in trailers several times now and it's getting old. Just so you know those "trailer folk" are the working class of this country that make it possible for this system called capitalism to work. And if any of the working poor (which in this economy could be any of us sooner than we think) were able to save a few pennies to invest and made good, more power to them!

Dog EESO all you want, this is a forum after all. But leave the people struggling to make it out of your condescending tirades.

Sleuth yes I am glad they refused the offer. Now as far as much making money on this, Yes I have made over $200,000 cash money and I am still holding 20 million shares. So I am not yet a millionaire but I could walk away today with 200 grands. Now why do I come here to try and convince some you to hold the freeking stock long just in case. I am not worried about the stock, I never was even after the drop why because I did my dd. Now there is difference between the money that I have made and the money some you have made. After eeso I will retire while some of you will still be here playing with penny stocks. I am sorry for the guys that don't believe, the rest of you good luck. Conference call next Tuesday at 6 pm on another board.

He would only make money if he sold his position. ANd that's assuming he's real.

Some of us already have a million dollars in the bank and play pennies for fun. Keep that in mind.

Basically the only thing this stock has going for it is some guy who amassed way more franchises of Little Caesars than he could handle (and ended up selling 2/3s of them back to Little Caesars in one fell swoop) is now involved in the multi-level marketing of EESO's product which Jared could instead sell to him personally (and cut out the EESO shareholder) at anytime.

Well I'm sold.

i-sleuth, you don't own shares, bye-bye!

you sure aren't here to save anyone, i can tell by your tone your not that nice.

I'm nice, I just get pissed off by con artists and hypesters.

But you're right to a certain extent - I'm definitely here more to prevent the grifters from making an easy buck than to save a noob from parting with his hard earned money.

meh, who gives a flying f***, buy it, flip it, hold it, believe in it, pump it, dump it, short it, bash it, take a loss on it for a tax write-off, whatever... it trades on the stink exchange, enuff said...

GO JARED&JARED!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amazing. The Pilot's last post prior to this last crappy, chip-on-his-shoulder response was on April 7, and prior to that March 25.
That should say something too.

"The Lord giveth...and the Lord taketh away."

Don't forget his other brother Jared.

http://www.wane.com/dpp/news/local_w...y_200904091600

A counter offer within the next few weeks? Sounds good to me!!

This chart also looks magical, I've got to get in this one.

Ro$$

mergers and acquisitions, i think, don't go final until the two parties actually sit down and sign the final papers -- what you're referring to as a contract isn't actually a contract, it's an offer, which EESO rejected --

if EESO would have accepted, then i think they would've entered into an "agreement and plan of merger", which is really "an agreement to agree" -- both parties will want to perform their due diligence before they actually agree to the merger, and during that time, you'll have underwriters or law firms come up with the necessary paperwork and financing that will actually finalize the deal, otherwise, there's not a contract -- that's why you have parties pull out at the last minute -- them pulling out probably is conditioned on something though, like the payment of a fee -- that's why you see they say the "phantom-buyer" put 1% of the buyout offer in escrow -- this was probably more of a good-faith effort though than an actual provision of a contract -- i might be wrong though

i'm just a law student that took first year contracts, so i'm not an expert, but i'm pretty sure that's right -- mergers are complicated -- google "agreement and plan of merger" and you'll see that it's complicated material

audited financial statements cost money, even though they wouldn't have to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, the stuff is still expensive

You just beat me to posting that link, darn.

Local news coverage? I wonder how much that cost? Like I said, that is one impressive scam...

In the great words of I-Sleuth, "I'M SOLD". I hope all you guys who are "looking out" for EESO investors will take the time to explain to the folks at wane.com how they have been suckered in to another pink sheet stock scam.

Keep up the good work, boys. My freebies think you're hilarious.

I don't get it...some local news broadcast decides to fill their show in with an interview of Jared basically parroting what has been said in PRs and you guys are of the opinion this "journalism" somehow legitamizes EESO's claim of the buyout offer being genuine?

meh, who gives a flying f*** ...your freebies, my profits, whatever, who cares...

I used to play in a local band, I was on local television too, now I'm here, trading on the stink exchange... local news means f*** all... companies on the stink exchange go nowhere and NEVER if RARELY uplist to NASDAQ or NSE, and why the f*** would you? the stink exchange provides companies protection from shareholders and not the other way around, on the stink exchange a company is unnaccountable for ANYTHING, can come up with any number it wants to , pr absolute buffalo dung if it likes, print money (I mean shares) at will and r/s when they reach their yearly limit so they can do it all over again... so, those being the hard facts about POS companies on the stink exchange, someone please tell me again why it is a good idea to invest in these 'companies' long-term, cuz me tinks me missing sumting

Man 500 posts from you since joining a month ago, imo your posts/language are crude, rude and abrasive, you keep slagging this stock but you don't know if it'll uplist, get bought out or anything more than any one else, take a chill pill dude. Try to be more mannerly with others then maybe folks will listen.

Well said...

That is probably one of the best posts I've ever read on here. Gentlemen, take note. Not that I could say anything that well - I'm just giving a bump to Mercury.

try to stick to discussing the stock without shifting the focus on my postcount or my choice of words, ok?

this will not be uplisted, Jared said at the shareholder's meeting "we have no plans to uplist, but we wouldn't mind being on the NASDAQ, someday" well... which is it??? and again, why would anyone uplist from the stinks when the advantages of being on the stinks are obvious...

Jared also said at the shareholder's meeting "I don't care what the current pps is, but I'd like to see a dollar or two" again, which is it??? kinda like "I don't care that I drive a rusted out Chevette, but I'd like to see a Bentley in my driveway"

Jared also said "we have no intentions of entertaining buyout offers" well... again... which is it??? since Jared did exactly what he said he wouldn't, you call this bashing? I call it holding a CEO accountable for his words and actions, period.

read back at my previous posts... I LOVE EESO, Jared has made me alot of money, and making the choice not to invest long-term in a stinky pink is not bashing a stock, IMO any stock on the pinks, is good for one thing only, flipping short-term and statisticly I AM RIGHT, its not me that makes the stats and its not me that sets the rules or lack thereof for companies on the stink exchange, the rules are what they are and they DO NOT FAVOUR LONG TERM INVESTORS IN THE PINK MARKET, PERIOD, THE RULES FAVOUR THE COMPANY TO DO AS IT WISHES REGARDLESS OF HOW IT AFFECTS SHAREHOLDERS, THOSE ARE FACTS... I've never bashed this stock, it dosen't need my help to do that, it does fine on its own... if I don't say what you want to hear, then go to IHUB, I'm sure the EESO chearleading squad over there will promptly interpret Jared's own words to suit your particular flavour of kool-aid... remember, Jared said these things, not me, its not my fault you fell asleep during the 'reading comprehension' part of 'English' class...

let's just focus on how you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. i'm convinced that you haven't actually listened to any of these conference calls and instead like to regurgitate inaccurate claims from other message boards.

what he actually said was "we have no plans to uplist TODAY" and he "would love to be on the NASDAQ but was not interested in uplisting in the current market conditions" ... that was on December 11th, 2008 and you are misquoting it 5 months later implying that it's recent news. it's since been re-addressed numerous times and his stance has not changed.

again, what he actually said was he's "not concerned if the pps takes a hit IN THE SHORT-TERM and his only concern is the long-term growth of the company both for the company itself and the long-term investors." he said that in December. he did say, at the February open house, that he would love to see it at a buck or two but acknowledged that he has no control over what it actually does. he quoted Warren Buffet saying he believes "if you build a company, the stock will follow" and that his plan is to do just that. how is that a contradiction again? oh, that's right, it's not. you're just clueless is all it is.

once again, you are wrong. the question was about a takeover which is the what I have to assume you're referring to. he said "we have received offers in the past and continue to receive them. we are not considering that AT THIS TIME, BUT WOULD CONSIDER IT IN THE FUTURE IF IT WOULD BENEFIT THE COMPANY AND INVESTORS." he didn't go back on his word here, either. how can pretend to be holding someone accountable when you don't even know what they actually said? you are a text-book uninformed investor or basher. take your pick. in any case, you couldn't more WRONG.

every potential event that the CEO alluded to in these conference calls has come to fruition to include a partnership (wowgreen), a stock buyback (4 mil accomplished of a proposed 20mil), and a South Korean contract ($12mil). this CEO actually follows through with his claims, not the other way around as you falsely state over and over. the major red flag to me, personally, is the lack of audited financials although even that has been promised for the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2009. even so, the CEO clearly states that his reason for not releasing audited financials at this time is to avoid weakening EESO's position in on-going negotiations. i might disagree, but it does make sense and it's better than a simple "no, i won't do it". the CEO has even addressed his unwillingness to procure patents compared to proprietary formulas; i'm not a fan of this stance, either, but it least it has been addressed. these are a few reasons why i don't think you can classify EESO as a typical pink sheet. as soon as I see evidence that conflicts with this, I will change my mind.