HotStockMarket › Forums › HSM Stock Forum › Canadian Stocks › RAY.V ---Potash stock
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

RAY.V ---Potash stock - Page 4

post #61 of 128
yeah almost everything seems to be down
post #62 of 128
I saw this video on Tv over the weekend very informative.
They also have other companies featured on the site.
http://www.b-tv.com/features/watch-now.html?id=292
post #63 of 128

report

Just wondering about this 43-101 report.. do companies usually delay the report? I know there is several days that it could come out on. (late may)
If it is late, how will this affect the pps?

Thanks
post #64 of 128
In the video it says this summer
post #65 of 128
Can anyone here think of any factors that are hurting this stock lately? I got in extremely high because I thought the report was due late may. It seems to be tanking considerably!
post #66 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bvlaar View Post
Can anyone here think of any factors that are hurting this stock lately? I got in extremely high because I thought the report was due late may. It seems to be tanking considerably!
That's far from tanking. I would call it a slight pullback. I don't think it will move to much lower. Of course that is just my opinion.
post #67 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by whinny View Post
That's far from tanking. I would call it a slight pullback. I don't think it will move to much lower. Of course that is just my opinion.
Yeah I hope!
The video that the poster above posted really reassured me on my investment. I really hope the 43-101 report comes out positive!
post #68 of 128
Agreed I already sold all my RAY however on this pullback I may buy back in i haven't heard anything about the report, KCL also has cooled off last time i checked it was down to $3.30 range so maybe the steam is coming off of the potash plays.
post #69 of 128
Looks like the company has been listed on the TSX since '81, but under a different name (or multiple names). In late 2007 they switched names with a standard change of business registration and became a tier 2 jr. mining company as per the tsx venture definitions.

I can only dig up share price data to as late as 2001, to which they saw $1.25 at the highs but sunk to under a dime before 2007 when they committed the change of business and new name.

What did they used to do before this? Were they unsuccessful? Are the same management still on board? What was their specialty before potash and iron ore?

How well known are their partners when it comes to uranium? Do they have any track record of success? (how about their management?)

What stopped the current dead mine they are sitting on from production? What was it mined for and why was it put out of production?

And lastly:

Given the company's current valuation, and the price of potash, how good will the results of 43-101 have to be in order to cause RAY.v to breakout?
If the results are good, mine worthy even, but not quite what the market was hoping for, how much downside does the current stock price have?
post #70 of 128
Halted

VANCOUVER, June 9 /CNW/ - The following issues have been halted by
Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC):

Issuer Name: Raytec Metals Corp.
TSX-V Ticker Symbol: RAY
Time of Halt: 9:23 E.T.
Reason for Halt: Pending News
post #71 of 128
Called the office and the news is regarding the 43-101 on the potash claim. Might resume trading late today or tomorrow at the latest.
post #72 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty View Post
Looks like the company has been listed on the TSX since '81, but under a different name (or multiple names). In late 2007 they switched names with a standard change of business registration and became a tier 2 jr. mining company as per the tsx venture definitions.

I can only dig up share price data to as late as 2001, to which they saw $1.25 at the highs but sunk to under a dime before 2007 when they committed the change of business and new name.

What did they used to do before this? Were they unsuccessful? Are the same management still on board? What was their specialty before potash and iron ore?

How well known are their partners when it comes to uranium? Do they have any track record of success? (how about their management?)\a

What stopped the current dead mine they are sitting on from production? What was it mined for and why was it put out of production?

And lastly:

Given the company's current valuation, and the price of potash, how good will the results of 43-101 have to be in order to cause RAY.v to breakout?
If the results are good, mine worthy even, but not quite what the market was hoping for, how much downside does the current stock price have?
If you look back and do your DD, you'll find that they actually used to do something along the lines of selling hospital equipment.

If they have a dead mine, then most likely it can be opened again at a profit. alot of these abandoned mines still have plenty of ore, it's just the economic situation didn't make feasible any longer to mine (as in couldnt mine for a large enough profit). But now that everything is through the roof, it is again mineable at a profit.

for a good breakout, we're gonna want around mid to high 20's of percentage in KCL, and atleast a nice 9+ foot tall ore body. That's for the Continuous Miner's and Alpines. if it's nice and deep around 1500 metres deep and no water flow, then leaching will be preferrable.

it is assumed at a rate of 3% per year demand growth, the required offsetting supply is estimated near 1.5 million to 2.0 million tonnes of KCL per year. So basically, one new 1.5 million tonne mine must open every year to meet the demand.
post #73 of 128

halted

Hey
I just looked in my Waterhouse account and it shows RAY.V is halted? Do any of you guys know why it might be halted? I am guessing it'd be for news, but I haven't been investing long enough to know some main reasons for being halted?
Thanks guys
post #74 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by whinny View Post
Called the office and the news is regarding the 43-101 on the potash claim. Might resume trading late today or tomorrow at the latest.
this was posted earlier by whinny
post #75 of 128

website

I just went to Raytec's website and it's changed significantly. Their intro screen spends time talking about potash. They also changed majority of their pages towards "feeding the earth"
So I'm guessing (not trying to get my hopes really up) that some positive will come soon of their potash properties. I would guess that they wouldn't gear their website towards potash if their property had very little signs of potash.
I guess we'll see soon enough
www.raytecmetals.com

Bvlaar
post #76 of 128
Thread Starter 
Raytec Announces NI43-101 Potash Resource
June 10, 2008


Vancouver, BC - Raytec Metals Corp. (the "Company") (TSX.V - RAY, Frankfurt – XZT, US - RAYMF) is pleased to announce the receipt of resource calculations from the Company's KP441 Potash Disposition Application ("KP441") located in south central Saskatchewan.



UPDATE 1-Potash Corp stock hits record as Goldman ups target
KP441 was the Company's first potash acquisition within the Saskatchewan potash basin and accounts for 88,320 acres of the Company's total land package of 291,330 acres under application. After reviewing data from historic drilling on KP441, the Company contracted Agapito Associates, Inc ("Agapito") to prepare a NI43-101 report for the newly acquired KP441 disposition. Agapito is a professional organization of engineers and geologists with over 25 years experience in Mining and Civil Engineering and Geology. Mr. Joseph E. Crawford L.P.G. and Dr. Michael Hardy P.E. are the qualified professionals who co-authored this technical report. Dr. Hardy has been involved with potash exploration, solution mining pilot testing, solution mining engineering studies including feasibility studies, and resource and reserve estimation since 2001. Agapito's client list includes over 180 Mining companies, including Intrepid Mining LLC., Potash One Inc. and Mississippi Potash.

The authors of the Company's NI43-101 technical report were able to obtain data from historic drilling on the KP441 disposition through the Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources as well as the Saskatchewan Industry and Resources branches. Cores from drilling in the potash rich members of the Prairie Evaporite Formation for Canadian Exploration Ltd. holes 16-6-39 and 16-18-39, were logged, split and assayed, using an appropriate protocol and security, to provide the authors with current data and assay results with which to prepare their report. Using results from both new and historic core assays, the authors were able to prepare a resource estimate for the extreme southwest corner of KP441. The resource estimate contains both an Indicated and Inferred resource for the Lower Patience Lake, the Upper Belle Plain and Lower Belle Plain formations. The potash resource remains open to the north and east of the study area, truncated to the south and west by the limits of the Company's potash lease application boundary.

In summary, the report estimates a total Indicated resource of 148.02 million metric tonnes ("MMT") grading 23.44% K2O and an additional Inferred resource of 229.16 MMT grading 20.40% K2O.

The above noted figures calculate to a total in-place Indicated resource of 34.70 MMT of K2O and a further in-place Inferred resource of 46.76 MMT of K2O. Recoverable in-place potash equivalent tonnes, assuming using standard deductions and an overall recovery of 36% (10% geologic anomaly and expected 40% extraction), are calculated to a net recoverable Indicated resource of 12.49 MMT of K2O and a net recoverable Inferred resource of 16.83 MMT of K2O.
post #77 of 128
Thread Starter 
Indicated Mineral Resources and Inferred Mineral Resources have been estimated based on the distance from cored and assayed drill holes using best available practice similar to that adopted by Mosaic at the Belle Plaine operations. The distance from an existing cored and assayed drill hole for inclusion of resource in the inferred and indicated categories is as follows:
Indicated Mineral Resource: 1-Mile (1.60 km) radius
Inferred Mineral Resource: 5-Mile (8.05 km) radius
The Indicated Mineral Resource and Inferred Mineral Resource has been estimated based on the radius from the cored drill holes, the estimated extent of the beds with grade and thickness greater than estimated cutoff values of 1.1m and 12% K2O, the thickness and grade of the selected mining intervals at the corehole locations, the loss factors for unaccounted geologic anomalies assumed to be 10%, an areal extraction ratio of 40%, and losses incurred by removal of resources in buffer zones.
This resource estimate determined using the Volumetric and Borehole Radius Analysis method, is based on two drill holes approximately 3.2 kilometers apart in the southwest corner of the KP441 disposition. This resource covers an area of approximately 17% of the KP441 disposition or approximately 5% of Raytec's 291,330 acres under application.

While it was not the objective of the NI43-101 report to select a mining method for exploiting the potash contained in the KP441 area, the resource classification was established in part by resources that are amenable to current mining technologies using typical grade values. "For the purpose of delineating potash resources, the Lower Patience Lake, Upper Belle Plaine, and Lower Belle Plaine Submembers are considered to have mining potential" states the report.

A complete copy of the NI43-101 compliant report will be published on the Company's website and on SEDAR shortly.

Carnallite is a hydrated magnesium chloride. It is considered an impurity that can be detrimental to solution mining. An industry threshold for magnesium chloride in plant feed is 1%. The average magnesium chloride content in the KP441 area resource estimate is 0.25% which is within the threshold limit and well below 1%.

"We are very pleased with the results of our current resource estimate. We believe this shows that Raytec has some very prospective potash ground in Saskatchewan. Our goal is to expand our current resources through seismic exploration and drilling of the property. Through my recent conversations with personnel at the Saskatchewan Government Mines Branch I expect to have our permit for KP441 issued in July. Raytec's main focus remains potash and fertilizer commodities" states Raytec president, Mr. Brian Thurston.

In addition, the Company wishes to announce the granting of incentive stock options to its directors, officers, consultants and employees, under its Stock Option Plan, for the purchase of up to 900,000 common shares of the Company for a period of 2 years at a price of $0.80 per share.
post #78 of 128
Excellent!


Report Estimates an Indicated Resource of 148.02 Million Metric Tonnes Grading 23.44% (K2O) Potash

And an Inferred Resource of 229.16 Million Metric Tonnes grading 20% (K2O) Potash

1st Junior to have a 43-101 Potash Resource

This is an Enormous Deposit! Still under $50 million mkt cap!!!
post #79 of 128
whats the price of k2o ? how many shares this company has ? tx
post #80 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito View Post
If you look back and do your DD, you'll find that they actually used to do something along the lines of selling hospital equipment.

If they have a dead mine, then most likely it can be opened again at a profit. alot of these abandoned mines still have plenty of ore, it's just the economic situation didn't make feasible any longer to mine (as in couldnt mine for a large enough profit). But now that everything is through the roof, it is again mineable at a profit.

for a good breakout, we're gonna want around mid to high 20's of percentage in KCL, and atleast a nice 9+ foot tall ore body. That's for the Continuous Miner's and Alpines. if it's nice and deep around 1500 metres deep and no water flow, then leaching will be preferrable.

it is assumed at a rate of 3% per year demand growth, the required offsetting supply is estimated near 1.5 million to 2.0 million tonnes of KCL per year. So basically, one new 1.5 million tonne mine must open every year to meet the demand.
I did a bit of research into them but found a lack of information available. The questions were really just to spur thinking, since potash is a mania sector of sorts it's always good to check your fundamentals over fallowing the trend.

If you feel they check out, cool, and good luck. I've been trading them recently and have made a buck, but I'm riding momentum and don't feel settled enough as of yet to be in for the long haul. Part of that is just work on my part I need to complete... and comparing my views on RAY.v with other potash plays as I'm disinterested in being overexposed to potash in any long term time frame.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Canadian Stocks
HotStockMarket › Forums › HSM Stock Forum › Canadian Stocks › RAY.V ---Potash stock