CCTC - Clean Coal Technologies Inc - Page 676  

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobK

 

Charges were filed against CCTC on June 4, 2012.

 

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22389.htm

 

You going to end up suprised in a few weeks.

Just got a little tidbit confirmed that the company is going to be dropped completly from the SEC civil suit. Turns out the SEC made a small mistake that caused the company name to be included as a defendant. I alluded to this very vaguely in a previous post.

I'd respectfully ask of you, that when they are dropped that you also be so diligent as to repeatedly post the information that they were dropped from the case as well.

Thank You

Quote:

Originally Posted by cracity 

When there's total social breakdown, like in Greece, I think there will be many scenarios, as you describe, occuring.

 

 

No, I think scumbags that hype up a turd trying to find new victims to dump there shares on are much worse. 

Oh the vocabularies of these "high class" investors on this forum are just amazing. Spoken like a true in the dark "investor" that has a tough time thinking outside his seafood restaurant hat!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phaeton 

 

You going to end up suprised in a few weeks.

 

Just got a little tidbit confirmed that the company is going to be dropped completly from the SEC civil suit. They did nothing wrong. Turns out the SEC made a small mistake that caused the company name to be included as a defendant. I alluded to this very vaguely in a previous post.

 

I'd respectfully ask of you, that when they are dropped that you also be so diligent as to repeatedly post the information that they were dropped from the case as well.

 

Thank You 

Phaeton, I just had confirmation of your statement from a source of mine as well.

In due time this irrelevant issue will pass too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phaeton 

You going to end up suprised in a few weeks.

 

Just got a little tidbit confirmed that the company is going to be dropped completly from the SEC civil suit. Turns out the SEC made a small mistake that caused the company name to be included as a defendant. I alluded to this very vaguely in a previous post.

 

I'd respectfully ask of you, that when they are dropped that you also be so diligent as to repeatedly post the information that they were dropped from the case as well.

 

Thank You

 

 

I will ensure that CCTC being dropped from the suit, is posted, repeatedly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cotrader64

 

 

Phaeton, I just had confirmation of your statement from a source of mine as well.

 

In due time this irrelevant issue will pass too.

Its already passed. Not an issue, never was, so moving on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tipota 

I will ensure that CCTC being dropped from the suit, is posted, repeatedly.

LoL :)

Things are taking shape very nicely now. I would venture to say that for the balance of this year we will see some very exiting PR's coming from CCTC leading up to the completion and eventual successful testing of the pilot plant in OK.  At that point in time.....the sky is the limit....Stay tuned.

OTC Markets Group's Policy Regarding Caveat Emptor and Promotional Activities

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CCTC/quote

Quote:

Originally Posted by cctclong 

OTC Markets Group's Policy Regarding Caveat Emptor and Promotional Activities

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CCTC/quote

Yes, this is what caused the low volume today.

The news from the SEC stating that it is Hague and not the company the charges are against will help to lift the warning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cctclong 

OTC Markets Group's Policy Regarding Caveat Emptor and Promotional Activities

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CCTC/quote

Yes, thats because of the SEC mistake with the civil case complaint. The company is not a defendant but due to the mistake was included as one. The company is working to have the skull and cross bones and all the other stuff removed. May take a few weeks for the news to appear that the company is dropped from the case, the wheels of government grind slowly. Its not an issue any longer, never was, thats what people have been trying to relate, but wait for the news the company was dropped and see for yourself.

I posted about this here > http://www.hotstockmarket.com/t/55309/cctc-clean-coal-technologies-inc/13500#post_2870014

This is a reaction to these places just now getting the news about the SEC (incorrect) complaint. It did not seem to affect too many brokers, some people were fine but others could not buy.

It would be good for a change if people got all the facts before they started trying to crucify someone immediately, but I guess the bashers could not pass up on what is essentially a basher wet dream because finally somthing they could point to and have a bashing orgasm over. If they had all these supoposed contacts at the SEC they claim, they would have found this out the day the complaint was filed. In a few weeks the bashers are going to really look stupid for all their claims when people start pointing to the news the company was dropped from the case and then start questioning the basher posts. The SEC mistake that caused all this is right there in the filed complaint, its so obvious, its glaring right out and just screaming "MISTAKE!".

Tried to tell ya, oh well.

This is getting funny! 

Quote:

Originally Posted by nowhentohold 

This is getting funny! 

Is it funny because you are getting scared that you have no idea how to do research and that there are actually posters here now that have done all the leg work possible and it is making your research look like an incredibly embarrassing sham? Poor guy!

That is funny! When you fail to understand how to accumulate information and how to network to find out what kind of developments are actually happening it should make you cry because you failed in this investment and sold at a loss. Poor guy!

NEW YORK, Jun 13, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (OTCQB: CCTC) (PINK: CCTC), an emerging cleaner-energy company utilizing patented technology to convert raw coal into a cleaner burning fuel, has initiated a civil action against Adam G. Segal, and various other John Doe defendants for allegedly libelous and defamatory remarks made publicly regarding Clean Coal Technologies and its officers. The action was filed in the Ouray District Court in Ouray, Colorado on June 8, 2012.

Commenting on the development, Robin Eves, CEO of Clean Coal Technologies, Inc., stated, "In August 2010, shortly after becoming CEO, I instructed our Director of Corporate Security, Rocky J. Lapomardo, B.S., M.Ed CFE PA, to investigate persons believed to be defaming the company with false and misleading statements through public online message boards including Yahoo Finance Message Boards, Investors Hub, and Clean Coal Scam Blog. After considerable analysis, it is also believed the defendants may have participated in short sales of CCTC, damaging the underlying value of the company and interfering with its ability to obtain financing and strategic alliances.

"We have chosen to pursue all legal remedies available to us in making these alleged perpetrators accountable," continued Mr. Eves. "We owe it to our shareholders to be proactive in defending the reputation and value of Clean Coal Technologies."

The summons may be reviewed in its entirety, by navigating to: http://www.trilogy-capital.com/autoir/cctc_autoir.html

Glad they finally got around to announcing that, kept wondering when they would finally do so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cctclong 

Clean Coal Technologies Announces Legal Action against Allegedly Libelous Short Sellers

Clean Coal's Management Has Chosen to Pursue All Legal Remedies Available to Hold Those Making False and Misleading Statements Accountable

NEW YORK, Jun 13, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (OTCQB: CCTC) (PINK: CCTC), an emerging cleaner-energy company utilizing patented technology to convert raw coal into a cleaner burning fuel, has initiated a civil action against Adam G. Segal, and various other John Doe defendants for allegedly libelous and defamatory remarks made publicly regarding Clean Coal Technologies and its officers. The action was filed in the Ouray District Court in Ouray, Colorado on June 8, 2012.

Commenting on the development, Robin Eves, CEO of Clean Coal Technologies, Inc., stated, "In August 2010, shortly after becoming CEO, I instructed our Director of Corporate Security, Rocky J. Lapomardo, B.S., M.Ed CFE PA, to investigate persons believed to be defaming the company with false and misleading statements through public online message boards including Yahoo Finance Message Boards, Investors Hub, and Clean Coal Scam Blog. After considerable analysis, it is also believed the defendants may have participated in short sales of CCTC, damaging the underlying value of the company and interfering with its ability to obtain financing and strategic alliances.

"We have chosen to pursue all legal remedies available to us in making these alleged perpetrators accountable," continued Mr. Eves. "We owe it to our shareholders to be proactive in defending the reputation and value of Clean Coal Technologies."

The summons may be reviewed in its entirety, by navigating to: http://www.trilogy-capital.com/autoir/cctc_autoir.html

Now this is a clear sign this is garbage

No, it just means its a suit for the things charged in the complaint against those named, the suit is bought by CCTC against those named in the suit as defendants.

asegal1229, pookymarc, asegal, tradermike, cctc_pump_n_dump, cctcsucksballs, p.rachman are all the same person and is asegal1228 over at ihub, there are other aliases as well.

He used the p.rachman alais mostly at MarketPlayGround.com (CCTC , uhh, hint hint hint)

This lawsuit against bashers is in its beginnings, so time will tell what the outcome is. However, harmful speech is not protected by the first amendment and defamation is harmful speech (libel is a type of defamation), and there are various laws in different forms both civil and criminal which overall govern such. All the defamation is in plain public view, there is a point where stated "opinion" becomes malicious and deliberate intent to harm and the defendants named in the suit have passed that point many times. Then with all the other things charged in the complaint, at the very least these defendants will be taxed greatly with financial losses in defending theirselves. After the civil case is over, if the company wins they can proceed to the criminal side of things and i'm not saying this will actually happen but its a possibility.

I see garbage pennies pulling this lawsuit crap all the time. I would head for the hills

Quote:

Originally Posted by cracity 

 

 

Now this is a clear sign this is garbage

The clear sign is that CCTC will not let peon bashers and or short sellers defame there name and technology I know its legal to short sell but its not legal to lie so the SP drops. And sombody better watch out there are eyes and ears peering even on this board. JMO. 

Quote:

Originally Posted by cracity 

I see garbage pennies pulling this lawsuit crap all the time. I would head for the hills

Maybe Cracity will be named in the next round.

What other aliases do you post under boy?

I love this.  It's about time these fools were shut down.  maybe the manipulation will cease now.