Originally Posted by CaliRaven
Never said I have all the answers my friend. I only said that I do not worry about that which I understand. You are looking at the situation with tunnel vision. His resignation was a move to protect the shareholder. You seem to be fixated on the "negative" connotation of the resignation and not thinking this through to see what a brilliant manuever this was.
I understand your emotional attachment and stress, but please take care in your tone. I have never been antagonistic against you. Step back and think about it.
Listen...I apologize if my tone is aggressive or impolite. Please disregard it if it is.
However, emotional attachment and stress aside, this is not a brilliant maneuver! He was unhappy with the turn of events, which triggered the resignation. He made no indication of coming back as C.E.O. tonight?
If I am wrong, please correct me, but I heard no such indication.