or Connect
HotStockMarket › Forums › HSM Stock Forum › Penny Stocks › CSHD - 11/6: No Court Tomorrow - SEC has CSHD sign Injunction.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CSHD - 11/6: No Court Tomorrow - SEC has CSHD sign Injunction. - Page 857  

post #17121 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by scratchy_too
I'M pretty sure he also said when asked about being part of the shareholder committee that once he comes out of this ordeal squeeky clean he would more than likely want to be involved with the company...this is his baby.

I take this as him saying he will be back as CEO

all IMO
Not at all. I don't think he will be back as C.E.O. As great as that would be, it is very unlikely.
post #17122 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by qrq3p7
fewhourssleep has gas..........


.
That is not true you are the one capping them off
post #17123 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northstar The Lost
And let me tell you what I understand.

Rufus was not happy with Conversion Solutions, therefore resigned.

The man who came up with the entire business plans and got the bonds for the company is now resigning. He was unhappy enough to RESIGN.

Now explain to me the part that I am not understanding, since you seem to have "all the answers"
Never said I have all the answers my friend. I only said that I do not worry about that which I understand. You are looking at the situation with tunnel vision. His resignation was a move to protect the shareholder. You seem to be fixated on the "negative" connotation of the resignation and not thinking this through to see what a brilliant manuever this was. The "rat" inside CSHD has been "dealt with". It happens. We move on.

I understand your emotional attachment and stress, but please take care in your tone. I have never been antagonistic against you. Step back and think about it.
post #17124 of 17243
Do they post the federal court dockets online? If so someone should check to see what is listed.
post #17125 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by occidental
He did not resign because he was unhappy with the company. He resigned because someone in the company was involved in activities that may bring the company down as long as Rufus' name was attached to it. He said that the company was his and he worked very hard to build it up to where it is now. He wasn't unhappy with the design of the company, but the predicament that a co-worker put him in which in turn forced him to resign for the benefit of all.
And my friend, I take that as a "not-so-good thing"

I would have MUCH RATHER had a ruling in our favor, rather than the SEC having CSHD sign the injunction.

And if this thing isn't PRed tomorrow, we have a SERIOUS problem
post #17126 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northstar The Lost
And let me tell you what I understand.

Rufus was not happy with Conversion Solutions, therefore resigned.

The man who came up with the entire business plans and got the bonds for the company is now resigning. He was unhappy enough to RESIGN.

Now explain to me the part that I am not understanding, since you seem to have "all the answers"

Whoa bud, you have it all wrong. He wasn't unhappy with CSHD. He reseigned to protect the company. I believe he will return. The deals done with CSHD continue with or without Rufus. If he is found guilty, Mike will pull his 7M shares, and Bens, and everyones. If he is vindicated then I believe that much should be back to the way it was.
post #17127 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northstar The Lost
This really is a freakin cult. Every single development is "super positive!"

If news came out like "Conversion Solutions went bankcrupt" everyone on this forum would be like "Wow Rufus and Mike really have a good one up their sleeve this time. They tricked the shorters into thinking we have no assets! Fry the shorty! Pray for a shorty! Shorts are screwed!"

Hey, wake up. Things are happening everyone. UNANTICIPATED THINGS. I don't know how we stand yet. I am not going to say I understand this, because NOBODY WHO IS NOT AN INSIDER UNDERSTANDS THIS. Don't act like you know and are almighty, because you probably arent
Sell!
post #17128 of 17243

what's important?

we heard from Rufus. that is all great. but Rufus is no longer associated with Con. Sol. what we need imo is to hear from the company. pr, 8k, 10q. plain and simple.
post #17129 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northstar The Lost
And my friend, I take that as a "not-so-good thing"

I would have MUCH RATHER had a ruling in our favor, rather than the SEC having CSHD sign the injunction.

And if this thing isn't PRed tomorrow, we have a SERIOUS problem
First, I'm not your friend. You can take it in anyway that you want. I'm only repeating the explanation to why he resigned, that is all.
post #17130 of 17243
Every one plz check your GTC from time to time.I already entered mine for $300...
post #17131 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRaven
Never said I have all the answers my friend. I only said that I do not worry about that which I understand. You are looking at the situation with tunnel vision. His resignation was a move to protect the shareholder. You seem to be fixated on the "negative" connotation of the resignation and not thinking this through to see what a brilliant manuever this was.

I understand your emotional attachment and stress, but please take care in your tone. I have never been antagonistic against you. Step back and think about it.
Listen...I apologize if my tone is aggressive or impolite. Please disregard it if it is.

However, emotional attachment and stress aside, this is not a brilliant maneuver! He was unhappy with the turn of events, which triggered the resignation. He made no indication of coming back as C.E.O. tonight?

If I am wrong, please correct me, but I heard no such indication.
post #17132 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by occidental
First, I'm not your friend. You can take it in anyway that you want. I'm only repeating the explanation to why he resigned, that is all.
I apologize. I will never refer to you in that way again.
post #17133 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmeic69
Just put in a limit order for 500 shares at 2.00, GTC's not allowed by my broker over a certain multiple of current price - hope this helps our cause-
I JUST TRIED TO PLACE AN ORDER,AFTER HOURS, WITH SCOTTRADE,
WOULD NOT TAKE IT?
post #17134 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by klplatt81
If anyone can buy shares, put in a bid before market open.
Unable to enter the order because this security is currently unavailable for trading online.

will phone the order in tomorrow morning...take care kev...
post #17135 of 17243
Can someone tell me what happened tonight .. Why arent we going to court ?? WHat did Rufus say about the whole deal ???
post #17136 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwalden
Unable to enter the order because this security is currently unavailable for trading online.

will phone the order in tomorrow morning...take care kev...
Are you trading with etrade?
post #17137 of 17243
Anybody else notice E*Trade will not accept any buying or selling online........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????? ????????? i can't even set my GTC order!!
post #17138 of 17243
Schwab said couldn't enter order shares are restricted.
post #17139 of 17243
What I want to know is what kind of reverse merger is it when the shell ended up with so much shares. With Mike's shares and the original fronthaul O/S we basically ended up owning more than 50% of the company.
post #17140 of 17243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northstar The Lost
This really is a freakin cult. Every single development is "super positive!"

If news came out like "Conversion Solutions went bankcrupt" everyone on this forum would be like "Wow Rufus and Mike really have a good one up their sleeve this time. They tricked the shorters into thinking we have no assets! Fry the shorty! Pray for a shorty! Shorts are screwed!"

Hey, wake up. Things are happening everyone. UNANTICIPATED THINGS. I don't know how we stand yet. I am not going to say I understand this, because NOBODY WHO IS NOT AN INSIDER UNDERSTANDS THIS. Don't act like you know and are almighty, because you probably arent
So because you lack the understanding you are suggesting that other's can't possess it? Your own lack of understanding doesn't guarantee the ignorance of others.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Penny Stocks
This thread is locked  
HotStockMarket › Forums › HSM Stock Forum › Penny Stocks › CSHD - 11/6: No Court Tomorrow - SEC has CSHD sign Injunction.