HotStockMarket › Forums › Stock Market How To › Stock Market Education › Ten Trades to a Million Bucks?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ten Trades to a Million Bucks?

post #1 of 412
Thread Starter 
It seems like there are constantly penny stocks out there that reach 2x, 3x, 5x, or even 10x+ their value. I suck real bad at pennies, so I'm not ready to try this experiment yet, but it seems like there are some people here - those that have the smarts and patience to wait for just the right time - that can make money off pennies consistently, often doubling their money or better.

Did you know that if you start with only $1000 and double it 10 times, you reach $1 million?

One day, I will get better at picking them, and I'm going to try this experiment:

I'm going to start with $1000, and wait for just the right time to pick a penny stock with lots of potential. Whether the company is good or not is irrelevant, as long as it's got the momo. (Rumours on the board often have the power to make a stock skyrocket!)

When I am confident that the stock has a much better chance to double than it has of halving, I'll go in and hopefully double my money. My exit will always be either 100% up (or more), or 50% down.

Once I reach the double mark, I'm ready to pull the trigger if it shows weakness. On the other hand, if it continues to rocket, I'll hold as long as it's going up. My goal is to get as much as possible, but mainly just for the double.

Once I've doubled my funds to $2000, I'll wait for the next perfect opportunity. Months if I have to!

Do it again to $4000, then $8000, then $16000, $32k, $64, $128, $256, $512 and finallly $1024000!

Ten trades with minimal risk. (Remember, you only started with $1000 of your own money, even if you've reached the $128k mark, you only ever really risk $1000 of 'your' money). Hell, I might even take out my initial $1000 after my third or fourth trade just to say that the entire experiment is free!

Now here's the real cool part. You can fail. You can fail as often as you want!

The ONLY goal you need to reach is to have picked 10 MORE double baggers than you did 50% losers. You can trade a total of 40 times, but if you picked 25 winners and 15 losers, you still get your $1 million! Hell, you can trade 150 times, as long as you picked 10 MORE doublers than 50% losers.

Say you lose the first trade. Now you have $500. Lose again, you got $250. But if you double twice, you're right back to where you began again. 10 trades away from $1 million.

Start - $1000.
Lose - $500.
Win - $1000.
Win - $2000.
Lose - $1000.
Win - $2000.
Win - $4000.
Win - $8000.
Lose - $4000.
Win - $8000.
Win - $16000.
etc...

You can see here that it really is true. All you ever need to get is 10 winning trades more than losing trades, regardless of how many trades you make!

The only problems I see with this are:

1) It won't be easy. If it was, everyone would do it! But I believe, from what I see on this board - people nailing doubles all the time - that with practice and patience and following the momo stocks carefully, it's very possible to do. You just need time to wait for the 'perfect setup' to happen. Don't chase stocks, etc.

2) When you get up to $128k or more, it will be difficult to get in and out of stocks quickly. You'll have to strategize more carefully.

3) It will take a lot of balls, or maybe just 2 really big ones, to keep going after you're up $30 or $60 or $100 grand! Most people will start to get very worried about losing it all, instead of remembering that they've only really got $1000 in there. Balls of steel will be essential. Or severe stupidity. One of the two.

Just wait for the momo to really pick up steam, wait for the pullback if you're too late, then place your trade. Simple! For someone that's actually good at pennies, I imagine they might reach this goal within just a couple of years or less.

I would love to see someone give this a shot and succeed!
post #2 of 412
The major thing you've ignored is psychology. Turning 1k into 1million is nearly impossible, and even if you start off doing well, maybe getting up to 3-4k, eventually you are going to take a significant loss. You'll have spent months (maybe even years) just getting up to that amount, and see it get sucked away in a short period of time. Then spend months upon months trying to get where you last were. That kind of experience really affects you in a negative way.

Also, anything over 50k in a penny stock is extremely risky in my opinion.
post #3 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamfrdmn1
The major thing you've ignored is psychology. Turning 1k into 1million is nearly impossible, and even if you start off doing well, maybe getting up to 3-4k, eventually you are going to take a significant loss. You'll have spent months (maybe even years) just getting up to that amount, and see it get sucked away in a short period of time. Then spend months upon months trying to get where you last were. That kind of experience really affects you in a negative way.

Also, anything over 50k in a penny stock is extremely risky in my opinion.
Actually, I didn't ignore psych at all. That's why I said you'll need balls of steel at those levels.

Of course, the whole point is to only start with $1000, so all those months or years of flipping to double is only supposed to be a side project. When you see a penny you're almost sure will double, do it, leave it, and go on to earn your living trading with the rest of your portfolio. Getting back to where you were? Only 1 good flip away! Seriously, if anyone were to try this, psychologically, it would be important to keep reminding oneself that it's only ever really only $1000. It's not a quarter million. That's just paper in an account. Until you reach a mil.

And anything over $2000 in pennies is risky, I think. LOL.
post #4 of 412
Your last step 512k to million
with 512k you can buy some penny companies 100% :-)
When you start to buy alot price will go up alot which you cannot afford. When you start to sell price will go down which you lose.
But Good Luck anyway let us know when you got your million so you can buy us a drink or something.
post #5 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by beylerbeyi
Your last step 512k to million
with 512k you can buy some penny companies 100% :-)
When you start to buy alot price will go up alot which you cannot afford. When you start to sell price will go down which you lose.
But Good Luck anyway let us know when you got your million so you can buy us a drink or something.

LOL. Yeah, I know. I was actually thinking that. I think, if anyone were ever to really make it to the $250k mark, you'd have to split it up and pick two pennies. You'd eventually have to make 14 of 15 good trades instead of 10. Or maybe just not trade the 0.03 ones. Might have to go up closer to $1 stocks?
post #6 of 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blooey
Actually, I didn't ignore psych at all. That's why I said you'll need balls of steel at those levels.
Well, unless I'm misunderstanding you, having balls of steel (aka having no fear) and being able to recover from feelings of utter despair from losing lots of money and all the time you invested are completely different. I was referring to the latter, since it can have a big influence on your trading. You might become too greedy in an attempt to make your money back, and end up losing more money due to an unclear mind.
post #7 of 412
Gotta love compounding

Blooey it would be an interesting experiment for sure. I know a trader who is working on something similar. He started with $500 2 weeks ago and is working on extremely high risk/reward plays and is trying to turn it into $1M by Christmas.

Anyway back to your topic.

You say you are only risking $1000, but this isn't really true. Remeber after each double you have to pay TAXES on those gains. So after each double it would be a good idea to take out some of that money to pay the taxes on your gains. That way you really aren't risking more than $1K.

Also once you reach >$250k it will be hard to play pennies, but there are plenty of low price stocks <$5 that double in a few weeks or months that you could easily move >$1M in and out.
post #8 of 412
What if you break it down to a more reasonable amount of trades say 25 to 1 mill. or 50 to one million. I think it can be done Blooey. Heck I am trying even as we speak
post #9 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by amohedas
Gotta love compounding

Blooey it would be an interesting experiment for sure. I know a trader who is working on something similar. He started with $500 2 weeks ago and is working on extremely high risk/reward plays and is trying to turn it into $1M by Christmas.

Anyway back to your topic.

You say you are only risking $1000, but this isn't really true. Remeber after each double you have to pay TAXES on those gains. So after each double it would be a good idea to take out some of that money to pay the taxes on your gains. That way you really aren't risking more than $1K.

Also once you reach >$250k it will be hard to play pennies, but there are plenty of low price stocks <$5 that double in a few weeks or months that you could easily move >$1M in and out.

Uh, what?! Oh, no, no, no... Please say that this isn't true! You can't possibly have to pay taxes on every gain earned from individual transactions if your losses outnumber your gains, can you?!

I mean, jeez, I've been going up and down like a yo-yo since I've started. All those fluctuations probably add up to half a million dollars by now, while the losses add up to half a million dollars plus a several thousand that I'm currently down.

Are you saying that even though I'm at a loss for the year, I'm going to have to pay taxes on half a million dollars worth of capital gains?!!!!! This can't be right!!!

Just to be clear. Are you saying that if a person starts with $5000, and makes two transactions - a ten bagger that brings him up to $50,000, and then another one where he losses 90% of his money so that he ends back up at $5000 - he still has to pay taxes on that $45,000 gain?! How can this be possible? It makes no sense...
post #10 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by McKinney Rex
What if you break it down to a more reasonable amount of trades say 25 to 1 mill. or 50 to one million. I think it can be done Blooey. Heck I am trying even as we speak
You're trying to do just this? That's awesome. Good luck! And let us know how it's working out! But, dude, unless you're already rich to begin with, I certainly wouldn't suggest you try starting out by putting your entire portfolio into a penny!!!

Well, I guess my assumption is based on the idea that you're not depending on luck so much as your skills in picking the right stock at the right time. I find that there are times when you absolutely know that a stock is going to go up, that you can make money on this stock right now. Those opportunities don't come by that often, but they do come by every once in a while. And if a trader with the right amount of patience (I don't have it yet!) waited just for those times to place a trade, then I think flipping from 32,000 or 64,000 to a mil, or 1,000 to a mil, wouldn't make much difference. If you can do it in five trades because you're good, you can do it in 10 because you're good. It will just take longer.

Personally, I think the only people who could afford to risk that much money in a penny are already rich.

But I hear what you're saying. Maybe a trader with 40 or 50k might be willing to start with $2000 or $4000 instead, in order to shave off a flip or two. Those two extra flips might be really hard to get, or take a very long time, so it might be worth it?
post #11 of 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blooey
Uh, what?! Oh, no, no, no... Please say that this isn't true! You can't possibly have to pay taxes on every gain earned from individual transactions if your losses outnumber your gains, can you?!

I mean, jeez, I've been going up and down like a yo-yo since I've started. All those fluctuations probably add up to half a million dollars by now, while the losses add up to half a million dollars plus a several thousand that I'm currently down.

Are you saying that even though I'm at a loss for the year, I'm going to have to pay taxes on half a million dollars worth of capital gains?!!!!! This can't be right!!!

Just to be clear. Are you saying that if a person starts with $5000, and makes two transactions - a ten bagger that brings him up to $50,000, and then another one where he losses 90% of his money so that he ends back up at $5000 - he still has to pay taxes on that $45,000 gain?! How can this be possible? It makes no sense...
That is exactly what I am saying.

I think I am right, but I'm no CPA so double check me please.

Let's take your example. I invest 5k into a stock and make a 10 bagger on it and sell the stock for a total of 50,000 and a proft of 45k. Now as far as the government is concerned that 45k is income. If I go out and buy some more stock with that income that's my problem. If I go out and buy 45k of some other stock and it goes to 0 I've lost my investment, but I still have to pay taxes on that original income.

You really need to double check me here (I know this sucks hard) becuase I'm no expert, but that's how I understand it.
post #12 of 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by amohedas
That is exactly what I am saying.

I think I am right, but I'm no CPA so double check me please.

Let's take your example. I invest 5k into a stock and make a 10 bagger on it and sell the stock for a total of 50,000 and a proft of 45k. Now as far as the government is concerned that 45k is income. If I go out and buy some more stock with that income that's my problem. If I go out and buy 45k of some other stock and it goes to 0 I've lost my investment, but I still have to pay taxes on that original income.

You really need to double check me here (I know this sucks hard) becuase I'm no expert, but that's how I understand it.
yes you do have to pay the tax on that 45k BUT since the 45k went to 0, you then have a right to write it off as a loss and dont need to pay the taxes anymore. end of year you should recieve a detailed account history from whoever your broker is. it will have capital gains & losses, if the capital gains exceed your losses, you pay taxes on that (whatever the diffrence is). if overall you have lost more in your account then you actually made, not only do you not pay taxes but it can help you get a bigger tax return.
post #13 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by amohedas
That is exactly what I am saying.

I think I am right, but I'm no CPA so double check me please.

Let's take your example. I invest 5k into a stock and make a 10 bagger on it and sell the stock for a total of 50,000 and a proft of 45k. Now as far as the government is concerned that 45k is income. If I go out and buy some more stock with that income that's my problem. If I go out and buy 45k of some other stock and it goes to 0 I've lost my investment, but I still have to pay taxes on that original income.

You really need to double check me here (I know this sucks hard) becuase I'm no expert, but that's how I understand it.
OK, now you're seriously scaring me Amo!

How in the world can that be right? I mean, at the end of the year, how are day traders supposed to make any money? You'd have to be right ALL the time. If you're correct, I am not shitting you, I am BANKRUPT.
post #14 of 412
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleo98
yes you do have to pay the tax on that 45k BUT since the 45k went to 0, you then have a right to write it off as a loss and dont need to pay the taxes anymore. end of year you should recieve a detailed account history from whoever your broker is. it will have capital gains & losses, if the capital gains exceed your losses, you pay taxes on that (whatever the diffrence is). if overall you have lost more in your account then you actually made, not only do you not pay taxes but it can help you get a bigger tax return.
Whew! OK, that's what I thought (assumed) and was trading that way. Can you imagine if a daytrader had to pay taxes on all his/her capital gains, but could never write off the losses? All those fluctuations surely add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year!

A quick check on about.com confirmed that you do indeed calculate the TOTAL capital gains against the TOTAL capital losses for the year.

Quote:
Capital Loss Limitations

If your total capital losses exceed your total capital gains for the whole year, then you have a net capital loss. Net capital losses are deductible up to a limit of $3,000 per year. Net capital losses in excess of the $3,000 limit are carried forward to next year's taxes.
Thank God!!!!
post #15 of 412
Err, now keep in mind it's been three years since I have done taxes.. However I DID do taxes for two years at H&R, and capital gains always have to be paid. Losses can be taken into account to offset those gains, but unless things have seriously changed, those losses were capped at 3,000 and then they carry over to the next year. So.. if you made $10,000 for the year in short term capital gains, and lost $8,000 on other trades, you're going to be paying out over a third on that 2,000 of profit.

I may have that totally ass-backwards, and if so someone point that out to me. I worked mainly on trusts and estate inheritances, so the stocks weren't my bag. (Not alot of short term gains in estates :P) However, I did do enough taxes for people who invested heavily in techs before the bubble burst to have a healthy respect for them. Some of those people will be carrying their losses for the next 10 years.

Meh, longer than I wanted it to be.. Anyway, golden rule is this: Uncle Sam will always get his pound of flesh. The only thing you can do is figure out how to make it hurt the least amount. Taxes are one of the things in life where knowledge truly equals power. The more you know, the less you'll pay.

Edit: Mistyped a number.
post #16 of 412
Blooey,

Lets disregard what I said and do some research. I need to figure this stuff out too!

But it seems unless you qualify as a "daytrader" under the eyes of Uncle Sam your capital losses are limited to $3k

http://taxes.yahoo.com/tips/invest/daytrader3.html
Quote:
Save More Taxes With a Mark-to-Market Election

As a trader, you can also make the special "mark-to-market" election. If you do, two very important tax benefits come your way.

* First, you don’t have to worry about the wash sale rule, which defers the tax loss when you buy the same stock within 30 days before or after a loss sale. If you make lots of trades, this can happen all the time. The disallowed wash sale loss gets added to the basis of the shares that caused the problem. In other words, with the mark-to-market election you won't have to spend as much time on bookkeeping as you do researching and trading stocks.
* You are also exempt from the $3,000 annual limit on net capital losses. Why? Because as a mark-to-market trader, all your trading gains and losses are considered "ordinary," just like garden-variety business income and expenses. If you have a biblically awful year, you can deduct your trading losses when you would otherwise be limited to a mere $3,000 writeoff. The tax savings should ease your pain.
http://www.smartmoney.com/tax/capita...ory=daytrading

Apparently the definition of a trader is not really clear. Quite vague if you ask me:

Quote:
The courts say you are a trader if:

· You spend lots of time trading. Preferably, you don't have a regular full-time job. (My reading is, you can also be a part-time trader, but you had better be buying and selling a handful of stocks just about every day.)
· You have established a regular and continuous pattern of making lots of trades (several almost every day the markets are open).
· Your goal is to profit from short-term market swings rather than from long-term gains or dividend income.
post #17 of 412
Guess I didn't mistype that number after all, I KNEW I remembered having to explain to some very upset people that their losses were capped at 3k for the year.

The daytrader rules are new to me however as well. Good to know that there is at least some protection for active traders, since otherwise it'd be almost impossible to make your fortune.
post #18 of 412
Blooey,

Sorry for hijacking your thread man. I turned it into another "OMG how do I do my taxes" thread

We need to ask some seasoned pros how this is done.

I'll get back to you.
post #19 of 412
I am 90% sure you only have to pay taxes on your total gains per year.....as in you made 50 but lost 40 k you have to pay taxes on 10 k. Still check but I am almost positive that is correct.
post #20 of 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmazzano
I am 90% sure you only have to pay taxes on your total gains per year.....as in you made 50 but lost 40 k you have to pay taxes on 10 k. Still check but I am almost positive that is correct.
From what I have read this is true if you qualify as a "trader", and the guidlines seem to be vague in that regard.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Stock Market Education
HotStockMarket › Forums › Stock Market How To › Stock Market Education › Ten Trades to a Million Bucks?